Skip to content

Conversation

@py-goh
Copy link
Contributor

@py-goh py-goh commented Apr 30, 2025

Update docs.json for adding ga4 integration

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for Google Analytics 4 (GA4) integration with a new configuration option for specifying a measurement ID.

Update docs.json for adding ga4 integration
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Walkthrough

A new "integrations" section was introduced at the top level of the docs.json configuration file. Within this section, a "ga4" object was added, which contains a "measurementId" property set to "G-8R3NNPM8SV". No other changes were made to the file or to any exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs.json Added a new "integrations" object with a nested "ga4" object containing a "measurementId" key.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the JSON warren, a new path appears,
"Integrations" now hopping with GA4 cheers!
A measurement ID tucked in with care,
For tracking and stats, it's all set to share.
With every page visit, the numbers will grow—
The data carrots harvested, row by row!
🥕


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ecb0e34 and bc395e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Mintlify Deployment

Comment on lines +17 to +21
"integrations": {
"ga4": {
"measurementId": "G-8R3NNPM8SV"
}
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Validate GA4 integration schema support
Ensure that the Mintlify docs JSON schema supports a top-level integrations key with a nested ga4.measurementId. Fetch and inspect the schema definition to confirm the property is recognized and correctly typed before deploying:

Expected output: a non-null JSON object describing the "integrations" property.
Once confirmed, this addition can be safely merged.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the Mintlify docs schema defines "integrations"
set -e
curl -s https://mintlify.com/docs.json | jq '.properties.integrations'

Length of output: 136


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -e
# Locate docs.json in the repo
DOC_FILE=$(fd docs.json | head -n1)
echo "Using schema file: $DOC_FILE"
# Inspect whether "integrations" is defined under properties
jq '.properties.integrations // "null"' "$DOC_FILE"
# If present, show nested GA4 schema details
jq '.properties.integrations.properties.ga4 // "null"' "$DOC_FILE"

Length of output: 257


Add GA4 integration to the docs schema
The docs.json schema currently does not define an integrations property, so any nested ga4.measurementId will be ignored. Please update docs.json under top-level properties to include the following:

--- docs.json
+++ docs.json
@@ “properties”: {
   …
+  "integrations": {
+    "type": "object",
+    "properties": {
+      "ga4": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "properties": {
+          "measurementId": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "description": "Google Analytics 4 Measurement ID"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": ["measurementId"],
+        "additionalProperties": false
+      }
+    },
+    "additionalProperties": false
+  },

• File: docs.json
• Section: top-level "properties"

With this added, your GA4 snippet will validate correctly against the schema.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents (early access)
In docs.json around lines 17 to 21, the top-level "properties" object lacks a definition for the "integrations" key, so the nested "ga4.measurementId" is not validated. To fix this, update the top-level "properties" in docs.json to include an "integrations" property with a nested "ga4" object that defines "measurementId" as a string. This will ensure the GA4 integration snippet validates correctly against the schema.

@akegaviar akegaviar merged commit 2d489b1 into main May 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@akegaviar akegaviar deleted the Add-GA4-Measurement-ID branch May 1, 2025 03:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants