Coderabbit tweaks

[sbouchet]

What does this PR do?

Adds and configures CodeRabbitAI (.coderabbit.yaml) to reduce review noise:

• Sets review profile to chill for less verbose feedback
• Focuses reviews on critical logic, security, and performance issues
• Disables poem generation in review comments
• Suppresses empty review status comments (no more "Review skipped" noise)
• Collapses walkthrough summary and hides changed files table when there are no findings

What issues does this PR fix?

N/A

How to test this PR?

Open a PR on the repo and verify that CodeRabbitAI only posts comments when there are actionable findings.

Does this PR contain changes that override default upstream Code-OSS behavior?

• the PR contains changes in the code folder (you can skip it if your changes are placed in a che extension )
• the corresponding items were added to the CHANGELOG.md file
• rules for automatic git rebase were added to the .rebase folder

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added CodeRabbit integration configuration for code review management, with customized review settings and behavior parameters.

[github-actions]

Click here to review and test in web IDE:

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new .coderabbit.yaml configuration file was added to customize CodeRabbit integration settings, including review tone constraints, path-specific rules for the changelog, and output formatting preferences such as disabling poem generation and collapsing empty walkthroughs.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CodeRabbit Configuration .coderabbit.yaml	New integration config file specifying review tone (critical logic/security/performance), markdown linting exceptions for changelog, review profile preference, and output formatting flags.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• rgrunber
• azatsarynnyy

Poem

🐰 A config file hops into view,
With settings precise and settings new,
No poems today, just logic so fine,
CodeRabbit's behavior—now perfectly aligned! 🎯

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Coderabbit tweaks' is vague and generic, failing to clearly summarize the specific changes made. It lacks descriptive detail about what was actually configured or modified.	Consider a more descriptive title like 'Configure CodeRabbit integration with review preferences' to clearly convey that this PR adds a new configuration file with specific review settings.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.coderabbit.yaml (1)

15-15: Consider adding a trailing newline.

YAML files conventionally end with a newline character. While not required, this follows POSIX text file standards and some tools may flag it.

✨ Proposed fix

Add a single blank line after line 15 to ensure the file ends with a newline character.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 15, Add a single trailing newline at the end of the
YAML file so it ends with a newline character (POSIX-compliant); edit the file
to insert one blank line at EOF to ensure tools won't flag the missing newline.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 13: Fix the typo in the YAML comment: change the word "genration" to
"generation" in the comment line that reads "# disable poem genration in
comments" so it becomes "# disable poem generation in comments"; update the
comment text only (no other changes).

---

Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 15: Add a single trailing newline at the end of the YAML file so it ends
with a newline character (POSIX-compliant); edit the file to insert one blank
line at EOF to ensure tools won't flag the missing newline.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0aa06816-c4b1-46b3-b1bc-a500a736e77b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 326f665 and 781958b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml

[github-actions]

Pull Request images published ✨

Editor amd64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-amd64
Editor arm64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-arm64
Dev image: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code-dev:pr-672-dev-amd64

[github-actions]

Pull Request images published ✨

Editor amd64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-amd64
Editor arm64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-arm64
Dev image: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code-dev:pr-672-dev-amd64

[github-actions]

Pull Request images published ✨

Editor amd64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-amd64
Editor arm64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-arm64
Dev image: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code-dev:pr-672-dev-amd64

[github-actions]

Pull Request images published ✨

Editor amd64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-amd64
Editor arm64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-arm64
Dev image: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code-dev:pr-672-dev-amd64

[rgrunber]

You don't enjoy being serenaded in iambic pentameter as you fix yet another minimatch issue ?

[github-actions]

Pull Request images published ✨

Editor amd64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-amd64
Editor arm64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-arm64
Dev image: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code-dev:pr-672-dev-amd64

[github-actions]

Pull Request images published ✨

Editor amd64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-amd64
Editor arm64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-672-arm64
Dev image: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code-dev:pr-672-dev-amd64

[sbouchet]

related to eclipse-che/che#23749