Skip to content

Conversation

@Brijeshthummar02
Copy link
Contributor

@Brijeshthummar02 Brijeshthummar02 commented Apr 30, 2025

Issue #15456
Closes #16926

@Brijeshthummar02 Brijeshthummar02 force-pushed the ExplicitInitializationCheck branch 3 times, most recently from 80442de to 20c2858 Compare April 30, 2025 12:10
@Brijeshthummar02 Brijeshthummar02 force-pushed the ExplicitInitializationCheck branch from 20c2858 to ca7f416 Compare April 30, 2025 12:28
@Brijeshthummar02
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Pankraz76 help me out. there's a lot failing

@Pankraz76
Copy link

item: https://dev.azure.com/romanivanovjr/romanivanovjr/_build/results?buildId=29119&view=logs&j=c902ebb4-c9f8-5f09-4e17-ff78fbbc842e&t=9ca98c81-ff64-58f0-9d03-a23ac1c4a111&l=1478

[INFO] Results:
[INFO] 
[ERROR] Errors: 
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckExamplesTest.testExample1:44->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 13 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/xdocs-examples/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/Example1.java
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckExamplesTest.testExample2:54->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 26 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/xdocs-examples/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/Example2.java
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckTest.testDefault:62->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 11 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/test/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/InputExplicitInitialization.java
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckTest.testOnlyObjectReferences:95->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 12 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/test/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/InputExplicitInitializationOnlyObjectReference.java
[INFO] 
[ERROR] Tests run: 5284, Failures: 0, Errors: 4, Skipped: 2
[INFO] 

@Brijeshthummar02
Copy link
Contributor Author

item: https://dev.azure.com/romanivanovjr/romanivanovjr/_build/results?buildId=29119&view=logs&j=c902ebb4-c9f8-5f09-4e17-ff78fbbc842e&t=9ca98c81-ff64-58f0-9d03-a23ac1c4a111&l=1478

[INFO] Results:
[INFO] 
[ERROR] Errors: 
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckExamplesTest.testExample1:44->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 13 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/xdocs-examples/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/Example1.java
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckExamplesTest.testExample2:54->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 26 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/xdocs-examples/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/Example2.java
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckTest.testDefault:62->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 11 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/test/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/InputExplicitInitialization.java
[ERROR]   ExplicitInitializationCheckTest.testOnlyObjectReferences:95->AbstractModuleTestSupport.verifyWithInlineConfigParser:256 » Checkstyle Violation message should be specified on line 12 in /home/vsts/work/1/s/src/test/resources/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/coding/explicitinitialization/InputExplicitInitializationOnlyObjectReference.java
[INFO] 
[ERROR] Tests run: 5284, Failures: 0, Errors: 4, Skipped: 2
[INFO] 

I already tried that but was not much helpful.

@romani
Copy link
Member

romani commented Apr 30, 2025

watch videos at Starting_Development.
One of last video shows how to resolve problems like this.

@romani
Copy link
Member

romani commented Jul 28, 2025

abandoned.
better to do this from scratch

@romani romani closed this Jul 28, 2025
@Brijeshthummar02 Brijeshthummar02 deleted the ExplicitInitializationCheck branch July 28, 2025 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants