Auto range picking

[lpatiny]

For well resolved peaks we do not cover the full multiiplet seems to me.

@jobo322 WDYT ?

[jobo322]

it is the combination of both tool, the ranges picking and peak picking without any optimization of the peak shape parameters

so the from-to seems to be ok with respect to 3 times the width of the peak in the border.

after optimization it looks like that

so the from-to would be better in terms of the limit of multiplet

[jobo322]

activating the options to optimize the peak picking result, the ranges looks better but we could add an options to increase like factorLimit that we use in optimize but used to define the from-to of the range

[lpatiny]

I we know peak width we should estimate to cover 99% of the surface in the integral I would say. For qNMR we will even think about having more.