Skip to content

Improving speed of CI testing#378

Merged
chrisiacovella merged 1 commit intochoderalab:mainfrom
chrisiacovella:rev-improving_testing
Aug 29, 2025
Merged

Improving speed of CI testing#378
chrisiacovella merged 1 commit intochoderalab:mainfrom
chrisiacovella:rev-improving_testing

Conversation

@chrisiacovella
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@chrisiacovella chrisiacovella commented Aug 29, 2025

Pull Request Summary

This PR is focused on trying different strategies to speed up our CI testing.

One issue is that the training tests are very memory intensive and only a single can be run at a time. I've tried putting these into a single xdist group (which will mean they will all execute on the same worker thus multiple will not be running at the same time); I've upped the number of workers to 4, since many of the other tests are not memory intensive (or cpu intensive), and can more can easily run concurrently.

this drops CI testing from 43 minutes to 23 minutes.

Associated Issue(s)

Pull Request Checklist

  • Issue(s) raised/addressed and linked
  • Includes appropriate unit test(s)
  • Appropriate docstring(s) added/updated
  • Appropriate .rst doc file(s) added/updated
  • PR is ready for review

…se tests are memory intensive and will fail on CI if more than one runs simultaneously)
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Aug 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.85%. Comparing base (4f7c718) to head (ca03092).

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@chrisiacovella chrisiacovella merged commit adf0b0e into choderalab:main Aug 29, 2025
17 checks passed
@chrisiacovella chrisiacovella deleted the rev-improving_testing branch August 29, 2025 23:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants