Skip to content

fix(presentation): refer to weekly SF, drop day-specific scheduling refs#146

Merged
cipher813 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/scheduling-day-refs
May 3, 2026
Merged

fix(presentation): refer to weekly SF, drop day-specific scheduling refs#146
cipher813 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/scheduling-day-refs

Conversation

@cipher813
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Per review: presentation surfaces should refer to "the weekly Step Function" rather than tying to a specific day (Saturday). Schedule specifics belong in CLAUDE.md, not user-facing READMEs — keeps the doc resilient if the schedule ever shifts.

Changes

  • README architecture diagram: Phase 1 · SatPhase 1 · weekly (also RAG ingestion + Phase 2 boxes)
  • OVERVIEW.md run modes table: Saturday Step Functionweekly Step Function (3 references)

Same change is being made across the other module repos that landed in PR #144's wake — keeps presentation language consistent across the system.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Per review: presentation surfaces should refer to "the weekly Step
Function" rather than tying to a specific day (Saturday). Schedule
specifics (cron expressions, day-of-week) belong in CLAUDE.md, not
in user-facing READMEs — keeps the doc resilient if the schedule
ever shifts.

- README architecture diagram: "Phase 1 · Sat" → "Phase 1 · weekly"
  (similarly for RAG ingestion + Phase 2 boxes)
- OVERVIEW.md run modes table: "Saturday Step Function" → "weekly
  Step Function" (3 references)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cipher813 cipher813 merged commit 6602ed6 into main May 3, 2026
1 check passed
@cipher813 cipher813 deleted the feat/scheduling-day-refs branch May 3, 2026 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant