added text and startup scripts ideas - not tested yet#64
added text and startup scripts ideas - not tested yet#64tido- wants to merge 1 commit intociur:masterfrom tido-:master
Conversation
| Manual Way | ||
| ************ | ||
| ### Quick install | ||
| Its simplicity makes SQLite extremely useful for development. It speeds up the setup of the development environment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This part (SQL) is not relevant for installation process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is not relevant for installation process.
@ciur , let me explain. You offer 3 different installation options. I found out via Email exchange why you use SQLite here instead of Postgre. I think it is nothing more but good practice to explain that in advance.
| the gaps. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Within extracted directory copy ``papermerge.conf.py.example`` to ``/etc/``:: | ||
| If I follow this document and still have troubles, I can open an |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Documentation is written from second person perspective - not first one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would have to jump back in the history, but I think I read both from you. I choose first one, can be 2nd. A simple change.
| Now you should be able to select text | ||
| Now you should be able to select text. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Start Papermerge at boot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this part is too specific. Start at boot of what ? These instructions would be more appropriate for specific distribution deployment (as part of that).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I copied the idea from here https://paperless.readthedocs.io/en/latest/setup.html#making-things-a-little-more-permanent if it is already installed and running why not using it?
And as this is setup guide, why not guiding it?
|
Hi Reto, I hate to say this, but I will not accept your PR. I commented along the diffs to provide you reasons why I chose to do so. |
|
It has some stuff in it that fixes errors, that I suggest you copy the way you want it to have/be. |
2 participants
Hi, please review.