Correct license for flatted 3.4.2 - ISC (false Artistic-2.0 detection from README)

[clearlydefinedbot]

Type: Incorrect

Summary:
Correct license for flatted 3.4.2 - ISC (false Artistic-2.0 detection from README)

Details:
The scancode/licensee tools incorrectly detect Artistic-2.0 AND ISC from the README.md file. The actual LICENSE file, package.json, and all source files (php, python, go) consistently declare ISC. This is the same false positive that was already curated for version 3.3.3.

Resolution:
https://github.com/WebReflection/flatted/blob/main/LICENSE

Affected definitions:

• flatted 3.4.2

[clearlydefinedbot]

You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined.

[picnich]

Hi curators — requesting review on this curation. This is a straightforward false positive: scancode/licensee is detecting Artistic-2.0 from the README.md, but the actual LICENSE file, package.json license field, and all source file headers (PHP, Python, Go) consistently declare ISC.

This is the exact same false positive that was already curated for flatted 3.3.3 — the README.md content is nearly identical between versions.

This is currently blocking dependency review checks for security updates (CVE-2026-32141, CVE-2026-33228) in downstream projects. Would appreciate a timely review. Thank you!

[capfei]

@picnich Thank you for the contribution!