Skip to content

Conversation

@panteliselef
Copy link
Member

@panteliselef panteliselef commented Feb 14, 2025

Description

Tracks usage of custom pages and custom items, and i squeezed the standalone prop as well :)

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@panteliselef panteliselef self-assigned this Feb 14, 2025
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 94e6965

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages
Name Type
@clerk/clerk-js Patch
@clerk/chrome-extension Patch
@clerk/clerk-expo Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandbox ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 14, 2025 3:52pm

@panteliselef panteliselef force-pushed the elef/sdki-703-update-telemetry-to-report-custompages-or-custom-items branch from a874d85 to 94e6965 Compare February 14, 2025 15:51
@panteliselef panteliselef requested a review from a team February 14, 2025 15:52
@panteliselef panteliselef marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2025 15:52
@panteliselef panteliselef merged commit f59491e into main Feb 14, 2025
31 checks passed
@panteliselef panteliselef deleted the elef/sdki-703-update-telemetry-to-report-custompages-or-custom-items branch February 14, 2025 17:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants