Skip to content

Conversation

@cjpatton
Copy link
Contributor

The landmark checkpoint is also part of the landmark bundle, but the landmark bundle is not a standard API and is only intended to be consumed by our internal infrastructure. Relying parties consume the landmark checkpoint as a TLOG note.

@cjpatton cjpatton requested a review from rozbb November 19, 2025 19:07
Copy link
Contributor

@rozbb rozbb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, with the same caveat that sequence, checkpoint, and bundle should probably be in a multi-PUT

@cjpatton
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM, with the same caveat that sequence, checkpoint, and bundle should probably be in a multi-PUT

Right, let me update the comment.

The landmark checkpoint is also part of the landmark bundle, but the
landmark bundle is not a standard API and is only intended to be
consumed by our internal infrastructure. Relying parties consume the
landmark checkpoint as a TLOG note.
@cjpatton cjpatton force-pushed the cjpatton/landmark-checkpoint branch from eaa9cc4 to ec2be83 Compare November 19, 2025 19:15
@cjpatton cjpatton requested a review from rozbb November 19, 2025 19:15
@cjpatton cjpatton merged commit dd4b0e6 into main Nov 19, 2025
1 check passed
@cjpatton cjpatton deleted the cjpatton/landmark-checkpoint branch November 19, 2025 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants