fix(radio): add shrink-0 to prevent oval distortion with long labels#509
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
/bonk approve please |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM 👍
Simple, focused fix that brings the default radio appearance in line with the card appearance. The shrink-0 prevents the radio button from being squished into an oval when paired with long labels—classic flexbox gotcha. Changeset is present and correctly scoped.
Contributor
|
✅ Approved PR #509 The fix adds |
commit: |
Contributor
Docs PreviewCommit: |
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

































Summary
Adds missing
shrink-0to the default appearance radio indicator, preventing the radio button from being squished into an oval when paired with long labelsThe card appearance already had
shrink-0; this brings the default path in lineReviews
bonk has reviewed the change
automated review not possible because: trivial one-class CSS fix
Tests
Additional testing not necessary because: single Tailwind utility addition with no behavioral change