Refactor SCIM docs#312
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR refactors the SCIM documentation to improve clarity and maintainability by adding prerequisites and focusing on the most commonly-used Identity Providers.
Changes:
- Added a comprehensive Prerequisites section detailing requirements for SCIM setup (plan type, admin access, domain registry, and IdP support)
- Removed documentation for less common IdPs (PingFederate, OneLogin, JumpCloud, and Google) and their corresponding files
- Removed "Early Access" warnings from Okta and Microsoft Entra ID SCIM integration pages
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/content/authentication/scim.mdx | Added prerequisites section, improved formatting consistency, updated provider list to show only Okta and Microsoft Entra ID |
| src/content/authentication/scim-with-okta.mdx | Removed "Early Access" warning banner |
| src/content/authentication/scim-with-microsoft-entra-id.mdx | Removed "Early Access" warning banner |
| src/content/authentication/scim-with-pingfederate.mdx | Deleted file for less common IdP |
| src/content/authentication/scim-with-onelogin.mdx | Deleted file for less common IdP (also contained incorrect link to JumpCloud documentation) |
| src/content/authentication/scim-with-jumpcloud.mdx | Deleted file for less common IdP |
| src/content/authentication/scim-with-google.mdx | Deleted file for less common IdP |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| </Note> | ||
|
|
||
| ## Supported Providers | ||
| ## Supported IdP Providers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The heading "Supported IdP Providers" is redundant since "IdP" already stands for "Identity Provider". Consider changing to either "Supported IdPs" or "Supported Identity Providers".
Suggested change
| ## Supported IdP Providers | |
| ## Supported IdPs |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a list of pre-requisites to SCIM provisioning.
Remove less known IDPs from documentation and provide only Okta and Entra as examples.