feat: new Coverage and overview metrics

[claudiacodacy]

👀 Live preview

https://coverage-and-overview-metrics--docs-codacy.netlify.app/organizations/reporting/organization-overview/

🚧 To do

• If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
• Perform a self-review of the changes
• Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

Test plan proposal

• Verify that all internal anchor links (e.g., #grade, #coverage, #overview-filters) resolve to the correct sections on the rendered page
• Confirm the Markdown tables in the 'Code health and security' and 'Coverage' sections render correctly without layout shifts or broken rows
• Validate that all newly referenced images (e.g., organization-overview-grade.png) exist in the repository and display correctly
• Check that external links to GitLab and Bitbucket documentation are functional and lead to the correct API references

[github-actions]

Overall readability score: 54.15 (🟢 +0.03)

File	Readability
organization-overview.md	54.8 (🟢 +6.37)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
organization-overview.md	54.8	24.34	8.77	12.5	14.49	6.93
	🟢 +6.37	🔴 -8.8	🟢 +2.99	🟢 +1.9	🔴 -1.32	🟢 +0.56

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	54.15	42.98	10.94	12.32	12.23	8.01
	🟢 +0.03	🔴 -0.04	🟢 +0.01	🟢 +0.01	🔴 -0.01	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[codacy-production]

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issue (≤ 0 minor issue)
0 new security issue
More details

✨ AI Reviewer: run the reviewer on demand. As new changes are pushed, run a review below.
To trigger the first review automatically, go to your organization or repository integration settings.
_{AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.}

 
  Run Reviewer ▶︎  
 

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

The documentation enhancements are high-quality and provide necessary details for the new features. Addressing minor inconsistencies in link attributes and image paths will ensure a professional and functional final output.

Suggestions for missing tests

• Verify that all internal anchor links (#grade, #complexity, #duplication, #coverage, #overview-filters, #coverage-note) resolve correctly to their respective sections.
• Confirm that external links to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket APIs open in a new tab as intended.
• Check the rendering of the 'Code health and security' table and ensure all links within it function correctly.
• Ensure that the text inside the HTML div tags is correctly parsed as Markdown by the static site generator.

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify that all internal anchor links (#grade, #complexity, #duplication, #coverage, #overview-filters, #coverage-note) resolve correctly to their respective sections.
2. Confirm that external links to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket APIs open in a new tab as intended.
3. Check the rendering of the 'Code health and security' table and ensure all links within it function correctly.
4. Ensure that the text inside the HTML `div` tags is correctly parsed as Markdown by the static site generator.

---

🗒️ Improve review quality by adding custom instructions.
💡 Codacy uses AI. Check for mistakes.