Add info about biomejs

[heliocodacy]

👀 Live preview

🚧 To do

• If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
• Perform a self-review of the changes
• Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

[github-actions]

Overall readability score: 54.13 (🟢 +0)

File	Readability
configuring-code-patterns.md	61.26 (🟢 +0)
codacy-configuration-file.md	57 (🟢 +0)
supported-languages-and-tools.md	49.15 (🟢 +0)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
configuring-code-patterns.md	61.26	38.82	9.49	11	11.89	7.1
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0
codacy-configuration-file.md	57	36.28	10.36	12.9	12.58	6.67
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0
supported-languages-and-tools.md	49.15	31.17	10.81	13.1	14.2	7.81
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	54.13	42.97	10.93	12.32	12.24	8.01
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback}

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

The PR documentation updates are generally correct and align with the intent to support BiomeJS. Codacy analysis indicates the changes are up to standards with no new quality issues. However, there is a discrepancy between the proposed configuration files and Biome's official documentation regarding dotfile support. This should be corrected to prevent user confusion. Furthermore, the PR description is empty, which should be addressed to provide proper context.

About this PR

• The PR description is empty. Please provide context or links to relevant issues as requested by the PR template to ensure traceability.

Test suggestions

• Verify BiomeJS is correctly listed in the Static Analysis column for CSS, JS, JSON, and TS.
• Verify the 'suggest fixes' icon is associated with BiomeJS for all supported languages.
• Verify the configuration file table lists all four expected filenames for BiomeJS.

---

🗒️ Improve review quality by adding custom instructions

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds documentation updates to reflect BiomeJS support in Codacy.

Changes:

• Added BiomeJS to the list of supported configuration files for code patterns.
• Added BiomeJS as a supported tool (and suggested-fixes provider) for CSS, JavaScript, JSON, and TypeScript.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
docs/repositories-configure/configuring-code-patterns.md	Documents BiomeJS configuration file names recognized by Codacy.
docs/getting-started/supported-languages-and-tools.md	Lists BiomeJS as a supported analysis tool (and suggested fixes) for several languages.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.