Skip to content

feature: adds coverage checks to merge queues documentation CF-2414#2643

Merged
pedrobpereira merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/coverage-merge-queues-CF-2414
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

feature: adds coverage checks to merge queues documentation CF-2414#2643
pedrobpereira merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/coverage-merge-queues-CF-2414

Conversation

@pedrobpereira
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pedrobpereira pedrobpereira commented Apr 24, 2026

👀 Live preview

live preview

🚧 To do

  • If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
  • Perform a self-review of the changes
  • Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 24, 2026 11:50
@pedrobpereira pedrobpereira requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2026 11:50
@pedrobpereira pedrobpereira force-pushed the feature/coverage-merge-queues-CF-2414 branch from a2377e9 to f472899 Compare April 24, 2026 11:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Overall readability score: 54.18 (🟢 +0)

File Readability
github-integration.md 49.99 (🔴 -0.31)
View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
github-integration.md 49.99 34.76 11.66 13.3 12.71 7.84
  🔴 -0.31 🔴 -0.1 🔴 -0.02 🔴 -0.1 🔴 -0.06 🔴 -0.01

Averages:

  Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
Average 54.18 43.07 10.92 12.32 12.24 8.01
  🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0
View metric targets
Metric Range Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease 100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read) 60
Gunning Fog 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Auto. Read. Index 6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Coleman Liau Index 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability 4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read) 6.9 or less

@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

codacy-production Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the GitHub integration documentation to clarify how Codacy status checks behave for GitHub merge queues (merge group events), including coverage-related checks.

Changes:

  • Document that merge queue events trigger green checks not only for Codacy Static Code Analysis, but also for Codacy Coverage Variation and Codacy Diff Coverage when the corresponding gates are enforced.
  • Split and tighten the merge queue explanation into two paragraphs for readability.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread docs/repositories-configure/integrations/github-integration.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

While the documentation content aligns with the acceptance criteria for CF-2414, the PR contains a broken relative link to the Quality Gates documentation that needs to be corrected before merging. Codacy's automated analysis is up to standards with no new quality issues. Please verify if the functional implementation (sending the actual status checks) is addressed in a separate repository or PR, as the linked Jira task suggests code-level changes.

Low confidence findings
  • The Jira ticket CF-2414 is described as a functional task ('check mandatory gates and send respective green status checks'), yet this PR only includes documentation changes. Please ensure that the corresponding service-level implementation is tracked and completed elsewhere if it was not intended to be part of this PR.

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

Comment thread docs/repositories-configure/integrations/github-integration.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

The documentation updates accurately reflect the addition of Codacy Coverage Variation and Codacy Diff Coverage checks within GitHub merge queues. The changes satisfy the requirements to clarify Quality Gate dependencies and the logic behind the green status checks.

Codacy analysis shows the PR is up to standards with no new issues or complexity increases. All planned documentation scenarios have been verified as present in the diff. No critical issues were identified that should prevent merging.

About this PR

  • The PR description is currently empty. Please provide context regarding whether this documentation change coincides with a specific service-level implementation, especially given that the linked Jira ticket (CF-2414) suggests functional work.

Test suggestions

  • Verify that the documentation correctly lists all three status checks (Static Analysis, Coverage Variation, Diff Coverage) for merge queues.
  • Verify the documentation includes the condition regarding Quality Gate enforcement for coverage checks.

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

@pedrobpereira pedrobpereira merged commit 8783e42 into master Apr 24, 2026
5 checks passed
@pedrobpereira pedrobpereira deleted the feature/coverage-merge-queues-CF-2414 branch April 24, 2026 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants