Skip to content

Fix Repository Issues#2667

Merged
DMarinhoCodacy merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
fix-repository-issues
May 18, 2026
Merged

Fix Repository Issues#2667
DMarinhoCodacy merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
fix-repository-issues

Conversation

@DMarinhoCodacy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👀 Live preview

🚧 To do

  • If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
  • Perform a self-review of the changes
  • Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

@DMarinhoCodacy DMarinhoCodacy requested a review from a team as a code owner May 18, 2026 13:02
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 18, 2026

Overall readability score: 54.18 (🟢 +0)

File Readability
managing-security-and-risk.md 58.07 (🟢 +0)
supported-languages-and-tools.md 49.15 (🟢 +0)
View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
managing-security-and-risk.md 58.07 36.69 9.88 12.9 12.82 6.51
  🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0
supported-languages-and-tools.md 49.15 31.17 10.81 13.1 14.2 7.81
  🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0

Averages:

  Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
Average 54.18 43.1 10.91 12.31 12.24 8.01
  🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0
View metric targets
Metric Range Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease 100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read) 60
Gunning Fog 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Auto. Read. Index 6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Coleman Liau Index 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability 4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read) 6.9 or less

@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

codacy-production Bot commented May 18, 2026

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation to include several new supported languages and tools, such as GolangCI Lint, Agentlinter, BiomeJS, and Stylelint, across various sections. The review feedback identifies two HTML syntax errors in the security and risk management documentation: an unclosed anchor tag for the GolangCI Lint entry and a duplicate table row opening tag before the Less language entry.

Comment thread docs/organizations/managing-security-and-risk.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/organizations/managing-security-and-risk.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

While Codacy reports the PR as being up to standards, this review identifies several critical HTML syntax errors in the documentation tables that will likely break layout rendering in Markdown parsers. Specifically, unclosed anchor tags and duplicate table row tags were introduced.

Furthermore, the PR lacks necessary context for a production change; the title is generic ('Fix Repository Issues') and the description is entirely blank. These documentation updates require structural validation (as noted in the missing test scenarios) to ensure the table integrity is maintained across the documentation site.

About this PR

  • The PR title is highly generic and the description is empty. Please provide context regarding why these specific tools (BiomeJS, GolangCI Lint, etc.) are being added and reference any related issues or requirements.

Test suggestions

  • Verify HTML structure and tag nesting in the updated documentation tables.
  • Cross-reference added tools (e.g., BiomeJS) across all language-specific sections to ensure documentation consistency.
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify HTML structure and tag nesting in the updated documentation tables.

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

Comment thread docs/organizations/managing-security-and-risk.md
Comment thread docs/organizations/managing-security-and-risk.md Outdated
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to Netlify May 18, 2026 13:09 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to Netlify May 18, 2026 13:27 Inactive
@DMarinhoCodacy DMarinhoCodacy merged commit c0c1ad4 into master May 18, 2026
5 checks passed
@DMarinhoCodacy DMarinhoCodacy deleted the fix-repository-issues branch May 18, 2026 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants