Skip to content

Conversation

@gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Oct 16, 2024

PR Classification

Code cleanup and refactoring to remove the units of measurement system.

PR Summary

Significant refactoring to remove classes and interfaces related to units of measurement, and update references to constants.

  • Removed classes and interfaces: BinaryPrefix, BitStorageCapacity, ByteStorageCapacity, ByteUnit, DecimalPrefix, IPrefixMultiple, IUnit, PrefixMultipleDecoratorExtensions,
  • Moved constants BitsPerByte and BitsPerNibble to Convertible class,
  • Updated ProcessInfo to use direct string conversion for memory sizes,
  • Removed test files: BinaryPrefixTest.cs, BitStorageCapacityTest.cs, ByteStorageCapacityTest.cs, DecimalPrefixTest.cs,
  • Simplified StreamExtensionsTest.cs and StreamDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs by removing ByteStorageCapacity.FromBytes method calls.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated classes and interfaces related to binary and byte storage capacities, streamlining the codebase.
  • Documentation

    • Updated tests to reflect the removal of legacy classes.
  • Chores

    • Minor adjustments made to the DoubleExtensions class, enhancing functionality without altering public interfaces.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Oct 16, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the extensive removal of several classes, interfaces, enums, and methods from the Cuemon.Core namespace, including BinaryPrefix, BitStorageCapacity, ByteUnit, and others. Additionally, some properties and constants related to these entities have also been deleted. Minor updates to a property signature in DoubleExtensions.cs and a namespace change in RoundOffAccuracy.cs are also included, while other files remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/Cuemon.Core/BinaryPrefix.cs Class and static properties related to binary prefixes removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/BitStorageCapacity.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/BitUnit.cs Class, constants, and implicit operator method removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/ByteStorageCapacity.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/ByteUnit.cs Class, constants, and implicit operator method removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/DecimalPrefix.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/PrefixMultipleDecoratorExtensions.cs Method removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/IPrefixMultiple.cs Interface removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/IUnit.cs Interfaces removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/MultipleTable.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/NamingStyle.cs Enum removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/PrefixMultiple.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/PrefixUnit.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/StorageCapacity.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/StorageCapacityOptions.cs Class and properties removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/UnitFormatOptions.cs Class and properties removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/UnitPrefix.cs Enum removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/UnitPrefixFormatter.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Core/ZeroPrefix.cs Class removed.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/DoubleExtensions.cs Modifications to methods for converting UNIX Epoch time, computing factorial, and rounding off values; minor formatting adjustment.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/RoundOffAccuracy.cs Namespace updated.
src/Cuemon.Threading/RelationalOperator.cs Namespace updated.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/BinaryPrefixTest.cs Test class removed.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/DecimalPrefixTest.cs Test class removed.

Possibly related PRs

  • V9.0.0/remove unit prefix multiple #97: The main PR involves the removal of several classes and interfaces related to units of measurement, which aligns with the changes in the V9.0.0/remove unit prefix multiple PR that also focuses on eliminating similar components from the codebase.

🐇 In the code's meadow, we prance and play,
With classes removed, we clear the way.
No more prefixes to weigh us down,
Just a simpler path, no need to frown!
Hopping along, our code shines bright,
A joyful refactor, a delightful sight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/Cuemon.Core/Diagnostics/ProcessInfo.cs (1)

33-35: Consider improving readability for large memory values

The changes align with the PR objectives by removing the dependency on the ByteStorageCapacity class. Using CultureInfo.InvariantCulture ensures consistent formatting across different systems. However, for large memory values, the readability might be affected without unit prefixes (e.g., MB, GB).

To improve readability while maintaining the simplification, consider using a custom extension method or helper function to format large numbers. For example:

public static string FormatBytes(long bytes)
{
    string[] suffixes = { "B", "KB", "MB", "GB", "TB", "PB" };
    int counter = 0;
    decimal number = bytes;
    while (Math.Round(number / 1024) >= 1)
    {
        number = number / 1024;
        counter++;
    }
    return string.Format(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "{0:n1} {1}", number, suffixes[counter]);
}

Then use it in the ToString method:

builder.Append(FormattableString.Invariant($"WorkingSet64: {FormatBytes(Process.WorkingSet64)}"));
builder.Append(Alphanumeric.CaretChar);
builder.Append(FormattableString.Invariant($"TotalWorkingSet64: {FormatBytes(Process.GetProcesses().Select(p => p.WorkingSet64).Sum())}"));

This approach maintains the removal of the ByteStorageCapacity dependency while improving the readability of the output.

src/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography/AesCryptor.cs (1)

Line range hint 127-131: LGTM! Consider minor optimization.

The changes look good and are consistent with the refactoring effort. The functionality of the GenerateInitializationVector method remains unchanged.

Consider a minor optimization to improve readability and reduce repeated calculations:

- return Convertible.GetBytes(Generate.RandomString(BlockSize / Convertible.BitsPerByte, Alphanumeric.LettersAndNumbers, Alphanumeric.PunctuationMarks), options =>
+ const int initVectorLength = BlockSize / Convertible.BitsPerByte;
+ return Convertible.GetBytes(Generate.RandomString(initVectorLength, Alphanumeric.LettersAndNumbers, Alphanumeric.PunctuationMarks), options =>

This change introduces a constant for the initialization vector length, which improves readability and ensures the calculation is only done once.

src/Cuemon.Extensions.Net/Security/SignedUriOptions.cs (1)

179-180: LGTM! Consider updating error messages for clarity.

The changes correctly replace ByteUnit.BitsPerNibble with Convertible.BitsPerNibble, aligning with the PR objectives of removing the units of measurement system. The validation logic remains correct, ensuring the ContentMd5Header value is exactly 32 bytes (128 bits) long, which is appropriate for an MD5 hash.

Consider updating the error messages for improved clarity:

- Validator.ThrowIfLowerThan(value.Length, MessageDigest5.BitSize / Convertible.BitsPerNibble, nameof(value), FormattableString.Invariant($"The length of the value is lower than 128-bit / 32 byte."));
- Validator.ThrowIfGreaterThan(value.Length, MessageDigest5.BitSize / Convertible.BitsPerNibble, nameof(value), FormattableString.Invariant($"The length of the value is greater than 128-bit / 32 byte."));
+ Validator.ThrowIfLowerThan(value.Length, MessageDigest5.BitSize / Convertible.BitsPerNibble, nameof(value), FormattableString.Invariant($"The length of the value must be exactly 32 bytes (128 bits)."));
+ Validator.ThrowIfGreaterThan(value.Length, MessageDigest5.BitSize / Convertible.BitsPerNibble, nameof(value), FormattableString.Invariant($"The length of the value must be exactly 32 bytes (128 bits)."));

This change would make the error messages more precise and consistent with the actual validation being performed.

src/Cuemon.Core/Convertible.cs (1)

112-112: LGTM: Simplified bit size calculation

The modification to use the newly added BitsPerByte constant instead of ByteUnit.BitsPerByte aligns well with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system. This change reduces dependencies and simplifies the code while maintaining the correct functionality.

Consider renaming the bitSize variable to totalBits for improved clarity:

-var bitSize = byteSize * BitsPerByte;
+var totalBits = byteSize * BitsPerByte;

This small change could make the code even more self-explanatory.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82a29f6 and 9ac020e.

📒 Files selected for processing (31)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/BinaryPrefix.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/BitStorageCapacity.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/BitUnit.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/ByteStorageCapacity.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/ByteUnit.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/Convertible.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/DecimalPrefix.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/Diagnostics/ProcessInfo.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/PrefixMultipleDecoratorExtensions.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/IPrefixMultiple.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/IUnit.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/MultipleTable.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/NamingStyle.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/PrefixMultiple.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/PrefixUnit.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/Security/FowlerNollVoHash.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/StorageCapacity.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/StorageCapacityOptions.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/UnitFormatOptions.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/UnitPrefix.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/UnitPrefixFormatter.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/ZeroPrefix.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Extensions.Net/Security/SignedUriOptions.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography/AesCryptor.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography/AesKeyOptions.cs (1 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/BinaryPrefixTest.cs (0 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/BitStorageCapacityTest.cs (0 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/ByteStorageCapacityTest.cs (0 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/DecimalPrefixTest.cs (0 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/StreamExtensionsTest.cs (6 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/StreamDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (23)
  • src/Cuemon.Core/BinaryPrefix.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/BitStorageCapacity.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/BitUnit.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/ByteStorageCapacity.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/ByteUnit.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/DecimalPrefix.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/PrefixMultipleDecoratorExtensions.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/IPrefixMultiple.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/IUnit.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/MultipleTable.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/NamingStyle.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/PrefixMultiple.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/PrefixUnit.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/StorageCapacity.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/StorageCapacityOptions.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/UnitFormatOptions.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/UnitPrefix.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/UnitPrefixFormatter.cs
  • src/Cuemon.Core/ZeroPrefix.cs
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/BinaryPrefixTest.cs
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/BitStorageCapacityTest.cs
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/ByteStorageCapacityTest.cs
  • test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/DecimalPrefixTest.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/StreamExtensionsTest.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/Cuemon.Core/Security/FowlerNollVoHash.cs (1)

69-69: LGTM: Change aligns with PR objectives

The replacement of ByteUnit.BitsPerByte with Convertible.BitsPerByte is consistent with the PR's goal of removing the units of measurement system from the codebase. This change should maintain the same functionality while simplifying the code structure.

To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, let's verify the usage of Convertible.BitsPerByte:

✅ Verification successful

All active code now uses Convertible.BitsPerByte, and there are no remaining instances of ByteUnit.BitsPerByte outside of commented sections. The change aligns with the PR objectives of removing the units of measurement system from the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of Convertible.BitsPerByte and check for any remaining ByteUnit.BitsPerByte

# Test 1: Search for Convertible.BitsPerByte usage
echo "Occurrences of Convertible.BitsPerByte:"
rg --type csharp "Convertible\.BitsPerByte"

# Test 2: Check if there are any remaining instances of ByteUnit.BitsPerByte
echo "Checking for any remaining ByteUnit.BitsPerByte:"
rg --type csharp "ByteUnit\.BitsPerByte"

Length of output: 1746

src/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography/AesKeyOptions.cs (1)

62-66: LGTM! Consistent replacement of ByteUnit with Convertible.

The changes from ByteUnit.BitsPerByte to Convertible.BitsPerByte are consistent and align with the PR objectives of removing the units of measurement system. The functionality remains unchanged, as BitsPerByte is likely a constant value (8) in both cases.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of Convertible.BitsPerByte:

✅ Verification successful

All usages correctly replaced with Convertible.BitsPerByte

Verified that all active code now uses Convertible.BitsPerByte. Any remaining instances of ByteUnit.BitsPerByte are confined to commented-out sections and do not affect the functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of Convertible.BitsPerByte and check for any remaining ByteUnit.BitsPerByte

# Test 1: Search for Convertible.BitsPerByte usage
echo "Occurrences of Convertible.BitsPerByte:"
rg --type csharp "Convertible\.BitsPerByte"

# Test 2: Search for any remaining ByteUnit.BitsPerByte
echo "\nChecking for any remaining ByteUnit.BitsPerByte:"
rg --type csharp "ByteUnit\.BitsPerByte"

Length of output: 1750

src/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography/AesCryptor.cs (2)

Line range hint 1-156: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives

The modifications in this file successfully implement the removal of the units of measurement system as per the PR objectives. The functionality of the AesCryptor class remains intact, with only the source of constants changing from ByteUnit to Convertible. These changes contribute to the overall goal of simplifying the codebase and improving maintainability.


43-44: LGTM! Verify constant in Convertible class.

The changes look good and align with the PR objectives of removing the units of measurement system. The functionality remains the same, only the source of the constant has changed from ByteUnit.BitsPerByte to Convertible.BitsPerByte.

To ensure the constant exists in the Convertible class, please run the following script:

test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/StreamDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (7)

41-43: LGTM: Output simplified while preserving essential information.

The changes to the output statements simplify the code by directly using stream lengths instead of ByteStorageCapacity.FromBytes(). This modification aligns with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system while still providing the necessary information about stream sizes.


65-67: LGTM: Consistent simplification of output in async method.

The changes to the output statements in this async method mirror those made in the synchronous version, maintaining consistency across the codebase. The direct use of stream lengths instead of ByteStorageCapacity.FromBytes() aligns with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system.


105-107: LGTM: Consistent simplification across compression methods.

The changes to the output statements in the GZip compression method are consistent with those made in the Brotli compression methods. This uniform application of simplification across different compression algorithms maintains code consistency and aligns with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system.


129-131: LGTM: Consistent simplification in async GZip method.

The changes to the output statements in the async GZip compression method are consistent with those made in the synchronous version and other compression methods. This uniform application of simplification across both synchronous and asynchronous methods maintains code consistency and continues to align with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system.


167-169: LGTM: Consistent simplification across all compression methods.

The changes to the output statements in the Deflate compression method are consistent with those made in the Brotli and GZip compression methods. This uniform application of simplification across all compression algorithms maintains code consistency and continues to align with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system.


191-193: LGTM: Consistent simplification across all methods and compression algorithms.

The changes to the output statements in the async Deflate compression method are consistent with those made in all other compression methods, both synchronous and asynchronous. This uniform application of simplification across all methods and compression algorithms maintains excellent code consistency and fully aligns with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system.


41-43: Overall assessment: Consistent and beneficial simplification across the file.

The changes made throughout this file demonstrate a consistent approach to simplifying the output statements in all compression test methods, both synchronous and asynchronous. By removing the ByteStorageCapacity.FromBytes() calls and directly using stream lengths, the code becomes more straightforward while still providing the necessary information about stream sizes.

These modifications align perfectly with the PR objective of removing the units of measurement system from the codebase. The consistency of these changes across all methods and compression algorithms (Brotli, GZip, and Deflate) is commendable, as it maintains code uniformity and improves overall readability.

The simplification does not appear to impact the functionality or effectiveness of the tests, as the essential information about stream lengths is still preserved in the output.

Also applies to: 65-67, 105-107, 129-131, 167-169, 191-193

src/Cuemon.Core/Convertible.cs (1)

46-54: LGTM: Well-defined constants for bit operations

The addition of BitsPerByte and BitsPerNibble constants is a good practice. They provide clear, meaningful values that can be used throughout the codebase, improving readability and maintainability. The calculation of BitsPerNibble based on BitsPerByte ensures consistency if the value of BitsPerByte ever needs to change.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/RoundOffAccuracy.cs (1)

Line range hint 7-33: Consider future extensibility for higher precision.

The current enum covers a good range of precisions up to "NearestMillion". However, if there's a possibility that even higher precision might be needed in the future (e.g., NearestBillion, NearestTrillion), it might be worth considering how to extend this enum or make it more flexible.

Options to consider:

  1. Add higher precision values if they're likely to be needed.
  2. Implement a more dynamic system for precision that doesn't rely on a fixed enum, if extremely high or variable precision is required.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ac020e and a66f419.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/DoubleExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/RoundOffAccuracy.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Threading/RelationalOperator.cs (2 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.Core.Tests/DoubleExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/DoubleExtensions.cs
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.Core.Tests/DoubleExtensionsTest.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/Cuemon.Threading/RelationalOperator.cs (2)

Line range hint 2-36: Well-structured and documented enum.

The RelationalOperator enum is well-defined and thoroughly documented:

  • Each member has a clear, descriptive name and helpful XML documentation.
  • The enum includes a general description and a reference to external documentation.
  • The public accessibility is appropriate for its likely usage across the codebase.

This structure promotes code readability and maintainability.


1-1: Namespace change approved.

The namespace change from Cuemon to Cuemon.Threading aligns with the PR objectives of code cleanup and refactoring. This change appropriately categorizes the RelationalOperator enum under threading-related functionalities.

Let's verify that there are no remaining usages of the old namespace:

src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/RoundOffAccuracy.cs (1)

Line range hint 2-33: LGTM: Enum contents remain unchanged.

The RoundOffAccuracy enum members and their values are correctly maintained. The XML documentation for each member is clear and concise, providing good context for developers using this enum.

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
namespace Cuemon
namespace Cuemon.Extensions
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Migration guide missing and lingering namespace references.

The MigrationGuide.md file is missing, which means the namespace change from Cuemon to Cuemon.Extensions isn't documented. Additionally, there are still several using Cuemon. statements and comments referencing the old namespace throughout the codebase. This could lead to confusion and potential maintenance issues.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the impact of the namespace change.

The namespace has been changed from Cuemon to Cuemon.Extensions. While this change may improve code organization, it could potentially break existing code that references the RoundOffAccuracy enum.

Please ensure that:

  1. This change is consistent across the codebase.
  2. It's documented in the migration guide for v9.0.0.
  3. All references to this enum are updated accordingly.

Run the following script to verify the usage of RoundOffAccuracy in the codebase:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to RoundOffAccuracy in the old namespace

# Test 1: Search for RoundOffAccuracy usage in the old namespace
echo "Searching for RoundOffAccuracy in the old namespace:"
rg "Cuemon\.RoundOffAccuracy" --type cs

# Test 2: Verify that RoundOffAccuracy is now used with the new namespace
echo "Verifying RoundOffAccuracy usage in the new namespace:"
rg "Cuemon\.Extensions\.RoundOffAccuracy" --type cs

# Test 3: Check for any import statements that might need updating
echo "Checking for import statements that might need updating:"
rg "using Cuemon;" --type cs

Length of output: 483


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the migration guide includes the namespace change

# Test 1: Check if MigrationGuide.md mentions the namespace update
echo "Searching for namespace change in MigrationGuide.md:"
rg "Cuemon\.Extensions" MigrationGuide.md

# Test 2: Ensure no import statements use the old namespace outside of the specified file
echo "Searching for using Cuemon. in any .cs files except RoundOffAccuracy.cs:"
rg "using Cuemon\." --type cs --glob '!src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/RoundOffAccuracy.cs'

# Test 3: Look for any comments referencing the old namespace
echo "Searching for comments mentioning the old namespace:"
rg "//.*Cuemon\." --type cs

Length of output: 104437

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.61%. Comparing base (d6153ad) to head (a66f419).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography/AesKeyOptions.cs 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #97      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.14%   79.61%   -0.54%     
==========================================
  Files         614      606       -8     
  Lines       18939    18618     -321     
  Branches     1914     1897      -17     
==========================================
- Hits        15179    14823     -356     
- Misses       3710     3727      +17     
- Partials       50       68      +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 83e0c7a into main Oct 16, 2024
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.0/remove-unit-prefix-multiple branch October 16, 2024 23:48
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants