🎉 migrated Cuemon.Xunit.* to Codebelt.Xunit.* #1

gimlichael · 2024-09-15T20:00:17Z

PR Classification

New feature and project restructuring.

PR Summary

This pull request introduces significant updates and rebranding of the project, focusing on enhancing unit testing capabilities for xUnit and ASP.NET Core applications.

Migrated Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit, Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit.App, Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting and Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore to the confines of this repo, xunit,
Rebranded as Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit, Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App, Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting and Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore,
New NuGet packages available on NuGet with codebelt as owner,
Latest version will be 8.4.0; a bump from previous 8.3.2,
Continuation of this project will continue here.

The decision to move xUnit extensions out of Cuemon for .NET is to be more true to original vision and to provide faster updates with a tighter focus.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

New Features
- Introduced WebHostTest and GenericHostTest classes to enhance unit testing capabilities for ASP.NET Core applications.
- Added ServiceCollectionExtensions for improved logging and output management in unit tests.
- Implemented BoolMiddleware for dynamic display of configuration values in HTTP responses, aiding debugging.
Bug Fixes
- Streamlined CI/CD pipeline for enhanced build and test efficiency, focusing on pull requests and cross-platform capabilities.
Documentation
- Updated documentation for new features and classes to assist developers in utilizing the extensions effectively.
Chores
- Revised CI/CD pipeline configuration for improved stability and flexibility across multiple frameworks.

coderabbitai · 2024-09-15T20:00:26Z

Walkthrough

The changes involve extensive updates to the CI/CD pipeline configuration and the introduction of new classes and extension methods for unit testing within the Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit library. Key modifications include renaming the pipeline, altering triggers, implementing matrix strategies for builds and tests, and updating action versions for improved stability. New test classes and middleware have also been added to enhance testing capabilities for ASP.NET Core applications, promoting a structured approach to service configuration and logging.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/pipelines.yml`	Revised CI/CD pipeline configuration, including renaming, changing triggers from `push` to `pull_request`, adding matrix strategies, and updating action versions for stability.
`src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/WebHostTest.cs`	Introduced `WebHostTest` class for flexible ASP.NET Core application testing, allowing for dynamic configuration of services and application pipelines.
`src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs`	Added `GenericHostTest` class for testing generic hosts with flexible service configuration through multiple constructors.
`src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs`	Introduced extension methods for `IServiceCollection` to enhance unit testing capabilities with logging and output management.
`test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/BoolMiddleware.cs`	Added `BoolMiddleware` class to display configuration values in HTTP responses, aiding debugging and configuration validation.

Poem

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b65375d and 0407fb9.

Files selected for processing (5)

.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (3 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/WebHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/BoolMiddleware.cs (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/WebHostTest.cs
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/BoolMiddleware.cs

Additional context used

actionlint

Additional comments not posted (13)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
-- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
-- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
-- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
-- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
-- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
-- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
-- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
-- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

codecov · 2024-09-15T20:12:54Z

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

sonarqubecloud · 2024-09-15T20:14:27Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
4 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
74.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

github-advanced-security · 2024-09-15T20:15:00Z

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 9

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a868e3 and b65375d.

Files selected for processing (82)

.docfx/BuildDocfxImage.ps1 (1 hunks)
.docfx/Dockerfile.docfx (1 hunks)
.docfx/PublishDocfxImage.ps1 (1 hunks)
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Http.Features.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Http.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/docfx.json (3 hunks)
.docfx/includes/availability-default.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/includes/availability-modern.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/index.md (1 hunks)
.docfx/toc.yml (1 hunks)
.github/dependabot.yml (0 hunks)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (3 hunks)
.nuget/ClassLibrary1/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (0 hunks)
.nuget/ClassLibrary1/README.md (0 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App/README.md (1 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/README.md (1 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/README.md (1 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/README.md (1 hunks)
CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
ClassLibrary1.sln (0 hunks)
Codebelt.Xunit.sln (1 hunks)
Directory.Build.props (4 hunks)
Directory.Build.targets (1 hunks)
src/ClassLibrary1/Class1.cs (0 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App.csproj (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/AspNetCoreHostFixture.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/AspNetCoreHostFixtureExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/AspNetCoreHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.csproj (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/Http/FakeHttpContextAccessor.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/Http/Features/FakeHttpRequestFeature.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/Http/Features/FakeHttpResponseFeature.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/HttpClientExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/IAspNetCoreHostFixture.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/IPipelineTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/IWebHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/WebHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/WebHostTestFactory.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.csproj (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTestFactory.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/HostFixture.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/HostFixtureExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/HostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/IConfigurationTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/IGenericHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/IHostFixture.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/IHostTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/IHostingEnvironmentTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/IServiceTest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/LoggerExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceProviderExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/XunitTestLogger.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/XunitTestLoggerEntry.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/XunitTestLoggerProvider.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.csproj (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/ITest.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/ITestOutputHelperAccessor.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/ITestStore.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/InMemoryTestStore.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/Test.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/TestOutputHelperAccessor.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/TestOutputHelperExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/WildcardOptions.cs (1 hunks)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/AspNetCoreHostTestTest.cs (1 hunks)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/BoolMiddleware.cs (1 hunks)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/BoolOptions.cs (1 hunks)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/WebHostTestFactoryTest.cs (1 hunks)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests/Assets/ScopedCorrelation.cs (1 hunks)

Files not processed due to max files limit (11)

test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests/Assets/SingletonCorrelation.cs
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests/Assets/TransientCorrelation.cs
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests.csproj
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests/HostTestTest.cs
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.Tests/appsettings.json
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Tests.csproj
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Tests/TestTest.cs
test/TestProject1/TestProject1.csproj
test/TestProject1/UnitTest1.cs
testenvironments.json

Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (5)

.github/dependabot.yml
.nuget/ClassLibrary1/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
.nuget/ClassLibrary1/README.md
ClassLibrary1.sln
src/ClassLibrary1/Class1.cs

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)

.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Http.Features.md
.docfx/includes/availability-default.md
.docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
.docfx/index.md
.docfx/toc.yml
Codebelt.Xunit.sln
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs

Additional context used

GitHub Check: codecov/patch

GitHub Check: 🔬 Code Quality Analysis

GitHub Check: 🛡️ Security Analysis

GitHub Check: 🧪 Test (windows-2022, Release)

GitHub Check: 🧪 Test (windows-2022, Debug)

GitHub Check: 🧪 Test (ubuntu-22.04, Release)

GitHub Check: 🧪 Test (ubuntu-22.04, Debug)

GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, netstandard2.0)

GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, net6.0)

GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, net8.0)

GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, netstandard2.0)

GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, net6.0)

GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, net8.0)

LanguageTool

actionlint

Additional comments not posted (161)

coderabbitai · 2024-09-15T20:18:48Z

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/XunitTestLoggerProvider.cs

+        public void Dispose()
+        {
+        }


Add test coverage for the Dispose method or remove it if not needed.

The static analysis tool indicates that the Dispose method at lines 30-32 is not covered by tests. Consider the following:

If the Dispose method is required to release unmanaged resources, add a test to ensure it behaves as expected.

If the Dispose method is not needed, remove it to avoid confusion and maintain a clean codebase.

Tools

GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 31-32: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/XunitTestLoggerProvider.cs#L31-L32
Added lines #L31 - L32 were not covered by tests

test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/BoolMiddleware.cs

coderabbitai · 2024-09-15T20:18:48Z

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/LoggerExtensions.cs

+                    }
+                }
+            }
+            throw new ArgumentException($"Logger does not contain a test store; did you remember to call {nameof(ServiceCollectionExtensions.AddXunitTestLogging)} before calling this method?", nameof(logger));


Add tests to cover the scenario where the logger does not contain a test store.

The static analysis hints indicate that lines 44-47 are not covered by tests. This could potentially lead to undetected bugs if the logger does not contain a test store.

Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Tools

GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 44-47: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/LoggerExtensions.cs#L44-L47
Added lines #L44 - L47 were not covered by tests

coderabbitai · 2024-09-15T20:18:49Z

test/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore.Tests/AspNetCoreHostTestTest.cs

+        [Fact]
+        public void ShouldLogToXunitTestLogging()
+        {
+            var logger = _pipeline.ApplicationServices.GetRequiredService<ILogger<AspNetCoreHostTestTest>>();
+            logger.LogInformation("Hello from {0}", nameof(ShouldLogToXunitTestLogging));
+        }


Add assertions to validate the logging behavior.

The test method is logging a message using the ILogger<AspNetCoreHostTestTest> instance, but there are no assertions to validate that the message is being captured by the Xunit test logging infrastructure.

Consider adding assertions to check the test output or the Xunit test logging sink to ensure that the logged message is present. For example:

// Example assertion var testOutput = _provider.GetRequiredService<ITestOutputHelperAccessor>().TestOutput; Assert.Contains("Hello from ShouldLogToXunitTestLogging", testOutput.Output);

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs

coderabbitai · 2024-09-15T20:18:49Z

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs

+using System;
+using Cuemon;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
+
+namespace Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting
+{
+    internal sealed class GenericHostTest : HostTest<HostFixture>, IGenericHostTest
+    {
+        private readonly Action<IServiceCollection> _serviceConfigurator;
+        private readonly Action<HostBuilderContext, IServiceCollection> _serviceConfiguratorWithContext;
+        private readonly Action<IHostBuilder> _hostConfigurator;
+        private HostBuilderContext _hostBuilderContext;
+
+        internal GenericHostTest(Action<IServiceCollection> serviceConfigurator, Action<IHostBuilder> hostConfigurator, HostFixture hostFixture) : base(hostFixture, callerType: serviceConfigurator?.Target?.GetType() ?? hostConfigurator?.Target?.GetType())
+        {
+            _serviceConfigurator = serviceConfigurator;
+            _hostConfigurator = hostConfigurator;
+            if (!hostFixture.HasValidState())
+            {
+                hostFixture.ConfigureHostCallback = ConfigureHost;
+                hostFixture.ConfigureCallback = Configure;
+                hostFixture.ConfigureServicesCallback = ConfigureServices;
+                hostFixture.ConfigureHost(this);
+            }
+            Host = hostFixture.Host;
+            ServiceProvider = hostFixture.Host.Services;
+            Configure(hostFixture.Configuration, hostFixture.HostingEnvironment);
+        }
+
+        internal GenericHostTest(Action<HostBuilderContext, IServiceCollection> serviceConfigurator, Action<IHostBuilder> hostConfigurator, HostFixture hostFixture) : base(hostFixture, callerType: serviceConfigurator?.Target?.GetType() ?? hostConfigurator?.Target?.GetType())
+        {
+            _serviceConfiguratorWithContext = serviceConfigurator;
+            _hostConfigurator = hostConfigurator;
+            if (!hostFixture.HasValidState())
+            {
+                hostFixture.ConfigureHostCallback = ConfigureHost;
+                hostFixture.ConfigureCallback = Configure;
+                hostFixture.ConfigureServicesCallback = ConfigureServices;
+                hostFixture.ConfigureHost(this);
+            }
+            Host = hostFixture.Host;
+            ServiceProvider = hostFixture.Host.Services;
+            Configure(hostFixture.Configuration, hostFixture.HostingEnvironment);
+        }
+
+        protected override void InitializeHostFixture(HostFixture hostFixture)
+        {
+        }
+
+        protected override void ConfigureHost(IHostBuilder hb)
+        {
+            _hostBuilderContext = new HostBuilderContext(hb.Properties);
+            _hostConfigurator?.Invoke(hb);
+        }
+
+        public override void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
+        {
+            _serviceConfigurator?.Invoke(services);
+            _serviceConfiguratorWithContext?.Invoke(Tweaker.Adjust(_hostBuilderContext, hbc =>
+            {
+                hbc.Configuration = Configuration;
+                hbc.HostingEnvironment = HostingEnvironment;
+                return hbc;
+            }), services);
+        }
+    }
+}


Improve test coverage for the GenericHostTest class.

The static analysis hints indicate that several lines, especially in the constructors and configuration methods, are not covered by tests. To ensure the reliability and maintainability of the code, it's important to have adequate test coverage.

Do you want me to generate the missing unit tests or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Tools

GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 16-18: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L16-L18
Added lines #L16 - L18 were not covered by tests

[warning] 20-29: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L20-L29
Added lines #L20 - L29 were not covered by tests

[warning] 32-34: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L32-L34
Added lines #L32 - L34 were not covered by tests

[warning] 36-45: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L36-L45
Added lines #L36 - L45 were not covered by tests

[warning] 48-49: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L48-L49
Added lines #L48 - L49 were not covered by tests

[warning] 52-53: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L52-L53
Added lines #L52 - L53 were not covered by tests

[warning] 55-55: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L55
Added line #L55 was not covered by tests

[warning] 58-58: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests

[warning] 61-66: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/GenericHostTest.cs#L61-L66
Added lines #L61 - L66 were not covered by tests

GitHub Check: 🔬 Code Quality Analysis

[warning] 47-47:
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw a 'NotSupportedException' or complete the implementation. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1186)

[warning] 47-47:
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw a 'NotSupportedException' or complete the implementation. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1186)

[warning] 47-47:
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw a 'NotSupportedException' or complete the implementation. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1186)

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs

coderabbitai · 2024-09-15T20:18:49Z

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore/WebHostTest.cs

+        protected override void InitializeHostFixture(AspNetCoreHostFixture hostFixture)
+        {
+        }


Address the empty InitializeHostFixture method.

The static analysis tool has correctly identified that the InitializeHostFixture method is empty. Please consider one of the following actions:

If the method is not required, remove it to avoid confusion and improve code clarity.

If the method is intentionally left empty, add a comment explaining the reason for the empty implementation. For example:

protected override void InitializeHostFixture(AspNetCoreHostFixture hostFixture) { // Intentionally left empty as no additional initialization is required for the host fixture. }

Tools

GitHub Check: 🔬 Code Quality Analysis

[warning] 56-56:
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw a 'NotSupportedException' or complete the implementation. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1186)

[warning] 56-56:
Add a nested comment explaining why this method is empty, throw a 'NotSupportedException' or complete the implementation. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1186)

coderabbitai · 2024-09-15T20:18:49Z

src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/HostTest.cs

+        protected HostTest(T hostFixture, ITestOutputHelper output = null, Type callerType = null) : base(output, callerType)
+        {
+            Validator.ThrowIfNull(hostFixture);
+            InitializeHostFixture(hostFixture);


Consider moving the InitializeHostFixture call out of the constructor.

The static analysis tool has flagged a warning about calling the overridable InitializeHostFixture method from the constructor. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the method is overridden in derived classes.

To address this, consider moving the InitializeHostFixture call out of the constructor and into a separate non-virtual method that is called explicitly by derived classes. For example:

- protected HostTest(T hostFixture, ITestOutputHelper output = null, Type callerType = null) : base(output, callerType) - { - Validator.ThrowIfNull(hostFixture); - InitializeHostFixture(hostFixture); - } + protected HostTest(T hostFixture, ITestOutputHelper output = null, Type callerType = null) : base(output, callerType) + { + Validator.ThrowIfNull(hostFixture); + } + + protected void SetUpHostFixture(T hostFixture) + { + InitializeHostFixture(hostFixture); + }

Then, in derived classes, explicitly call the SetUpHostFixture method after the constructor:

public class MyTest : HostTest<MyHostFixture> { public MyTest(MyHostFixture hostFixture) : base(hostFixture) { SetUpHostFixture(hostFixture); } // ... }

This way, the InitializeHostFixture method is not called from the constructor, and derived classes have control over when to initialize the host fixture.

Tools

GitHub Check: 🔬 Code Quality Analysis

[warning] 29-29:
Remove this call from a constructor to the overridable 'InitializeHostFixture' method. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1699)

[warning] 29-29:
Remove this call from a constructor to the overridable 'InitializeHostFixture' method. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1699)

sonarqubecloud · 2024-09-15T21:22:20Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
69.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

🎉 migrated Cuemon.Xunit.* to Codebelt.Xunit.*

96ad7f0

gimlichael added 2 commits September 15, 2024 22:06

👷 fix CI

7e777d3

✏️ renamed to xUnit

b65375d

✏️ sharedkernel -> xunit

5a9fcb1

coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 15, 2024

View reviewed changes

gimlichael added 3 commits September 15, 2024 22:19

✏️ removed accessor

3fafde4

✏️ typo

05c99bf

🚨 provided info to blank InitializeHostFixture override

0407fb9

gimlichael merged commit 270b1c9 into main Sep 15, 2024

gimlichael deleted the v8.4.0/migrate-from-cuemon branch September 15, 2024 21:24

This was referenced Sep 15, 2024

V9.0.0/net9rc1 support #3

Merged

V8.4.1/hotfix add xunit test logging #5

Closed

V9.0.0/net9rc1 alembic #7

Closed

This was referenced Sep 23, 2024

V9.0.0/housekeeping+alm #8

Merged

V9.0.0/housekeeping and cuemon aid #11

Merged

This was referenced Oct 1, 2024

V9.0.0/private assets experiment #12

Merged

V9.0.0/self contained code #14

Merged

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2024

V9.0.0/prepare for launch #20

Merged

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2025

V9.0.1/package maintenance #25

Merged

🎉 migrated Cuemon.Xunit.* to Codebelt.Xunit.* #1

🎉 migrated Cuemon.Xunit.* to Codebelt.Xunit.* #1

Uh oh!

Conversation

gimlichael commented Sep 15, 2024 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Classification

PR Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 15, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Changes

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

Documentation and Community

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2024

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 15, 2024

Quality Gate passed

Uh oh!

github-advanced-security bot commented Sep 15, 2024

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Removed

Added

Removed

Added

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Sep 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Sep 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Sep 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Sep 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Sep 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Sep 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 15, 2024

Quality Gate passed

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

gimlichael commented Sep 15, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 15, 2024 •

edited

Loading

CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)