⚡️ Speed up method AsyncV1SocketClient._is_binary_message by 29%
#15
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 29% (0.29x) speedup for
AsyncV1SocketClient._is_binary_messageinsrc/deepgram/agent/v1/socket_client.py⏱️ Runtime :
2.35 microseconds→1.82 microsecondss(best of42runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 28% speedup by replacing
isinstance(message, (bytes, bytearray))with direct type comparisons usingtype().Key optimization:
isinstance()with a tuple tot = type(message); return t is bytes or t is bytearrayisinstance()function has overhead from tuple unpacking and inheritance chain traversal, even for simple exact-type checks. Usingtype()with directiscomparisons eliminates this overhead by performing two fast identity checks instead.Performance breakdown from profiler:
When this helps most:
This optimization is particularly effective for high-frequency type checking scenarios where you need to distinguish between specific types (not subclasses). Since this appears to be part of a WebSocket message processing pipeline, the method likely gets called repeatedly during message handling, making even small per-call improvements compound significantly.
The optimization maintains identical behavior since both
bytesandbytearrayare final types with no common subclasses that would be affected by the change fromisinstance()to exact type matching.✅ Correctness verification report:
⏪ Replay Tests and Runtime
test_pytest_testsintegrationstest_integration_scenarios_py_testsunittest_core_utils_py_testsutilstest_htt__replay_test_0.py::test_deepgram_agent_v1_socket_client_AsyncV1SocketClient__is_binary_messageTo edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-AsyncV1SocketClient._is_binary_message-mh4g4046and push.