Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Oct 30, 2025

📄 84% (0.84x) speedup for BaseClient._parse_retry_after_header in src/openai/_base_client.py

⏱️ Runtime : 14.9 microseconds 8.14 microseconds (best of 31 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces the .get() method calls with direct dictionary-style lookups using in operator checks followed by [] access. This yields an 83% speedup by eliminating redundant header key normalizations.

Key changes:

  1. Header lookup strategy: Changed from response_headers.get("retry-after-ms", None) to if "retry-after-ms" in response_headers: retry_ms_header = response_headers["retry-after-ms"]
  2. Restructured control flow: Combined the retry-after date parsing logic into the same conditional block to avoid duplicate header lookups

Why this is faster:

  • httpx.Headers.get() performs case-insensitive header name normalization on every call, which involves string processing overhead
  • The in operator and [] access are more direct operations that avoid this normalization step
  • By checking for header existence first with in, we only perform the actual value retrieval when the header is present
  • The restructured flow eliminates a separate .get("retry-after") call by reusing the header value already retrieved

Performance characteristics:

  • Most effective when headers are missing (common case), as the optimized version can short-circuit faster
  • Also benefits cases where headers are present due to reduced method call overhead
  • The line profiler shows the header lookup operations dropped from ~30μs to ~21μs total time

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 6 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage 88.2%
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
codeflash_concolic_g6lys7gg/tmpi7fbcix4/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_BaseClient__parse_retry_after_header 9.73μs 4.05μs 140%✅
codeflash_concolic_g6lys7gg/tmpi7fbcix4/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_BaseClient__parse_retry_after_header_2 566ns 496ns 14.1%✅
codeflash_concolic_g6lys7gg/tmpi7fbcix4/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_BaseClient__parse_retry_after_header_3 4.64μs 3.59μs 29.4%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-BaseClient._parse_retry_after_header-mhd99b3b and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization replaces the `.get()` method calls with direct dictionary-style lookups using `in` operator checks followed by `[]` access. This yields an **83% speedup** by eliminating redundant header key normalizations.

**Key changes:**
1. **Header lookup strategy**: Changed from `response_headers.get("retry-after-ms", None)` to `if "retry-after-ms" in response_headers: retry_ms_header = response_headers["retry-after-ms"]`
2. **Restructured control flow**: Combined the retry-after date parsing logic into the same conditional block to avoid duplicate header lookups

**Why this is faster:**
- `httpx.Headers.get()` performs case-insensitive header name normalization on every call, which involves string processing overhead
- The `in` operator and `[]` access are more direct operations that avoid this normalization step
- By checking for header existence first with `in`, we only perform the actual value retrieval when the header is present
- The restructured flow eliminates a separate `.get("retry-after")` call by reusing the header value already retrieved

**Performance characteristics:**
- Most effective when headers are missing (common case), as the optimized version can short-circuit faster
- Also benefits cases where headers are present due to reduced method call overhead
- The line profiler shows the header lookup operations dropped from ~30μs to ~21μs total time
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 30, 2025 10:02
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Oct 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant