Skip to content

Conversation

@stephan-roolvink
Copy link
Contributor

The reason for this fix is that, when you cache a future that produces an exception you are storing an exception state. Which in my opinion does not make sence.

@josepjaume
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I forgot about this! It makes a lot of sense. Merging and releasing!

josepjaume added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2014
Future should not marschal when it contains exceptions
@josepjaume josepjaume merged commit bf04b49 into codegram:master Feb 11, 2014
@ggPeti
Copy link
Contributor

ggPeti commented Feb 13, 2014

I don't see why the whole body of __getobj__ needs to be factored out to another method. Why not just call __getobj__ from marshal_dump?

Edit: never mind, got it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants