Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This change instruments the IPhoneBuilder.java class within the codenameone-maven-plugin to provide granular timing statistics for the iOS build process.

Previously, the "VM Translation Time" metric aggregated many steps, obscuring the actual time taken by ParparVM versus other operations like CocoaPods installation or resource extraction.

Changes:

  • Added a Stopwatch inner class to IPhoneBuilder to track and log elapsed time for labeled steps.
  • Inserted stopwatch.split("Step Name") calls throughout the build() method to measure key phases:
    • Setup & Unzip
    • Extract Extensions
    • Google Services Setup
    • Scan Classes
    • Extract Libs
    • Inject Build Hints
    • Generate Unit Tests
    • Generate Stubs
    • Generate Native Stubs
    • Compile Stubs
    • Generate Icons
    • Prepare ParparVM
    • ParparVM Execution (isolating the actual bytecode translation)
    • Post-VM Setup
    • CocoaPods (isolating pod install time)
  • Added a summary log at the end of the build.

This will help developers and CI/CD pipelines pinpoint performance bottlenecks in the build process.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14438883967019953903 started by @shai-almog

Added a Stopwatch helper class to IPhoneBuilder.java and instrumented the build() method to log the duration of individual build steps (Setup, Extensions, Hints, Stubs, ParparVM, CocoaPods, etc.) separately. This allows for identifying performance bottlenecks in the iOS build process, specifically isolating the time spent on CocoaPods installation versus VM translation.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@github-actions
Copy link

✅ Continuous Quality Report

Test & Coverage

Static Analysis

Generated automatically by the PR CI workflow.

@shai-almog
Copy link
Collaborator

shai-almog commented Dec 19, 2025

Compared 30 screenshots: 30 matched.

Native Android coverage

  • 📊 Line coverage: 24.72% (2637/10667 lines covered) [HTML preview] (artifact android-coverage-report, jacocoAndroidReport/html/index.html)
    • Other counters: instruction 24.38% (12270/50336), branch 15.28% (709/4640), complexity 17.35% (732/4220), method 32.67% (593/1815), class 34.65% (105/303)
    • Lowest covered classes
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidContactsManager – 0.00% (0/400 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$Video – 0.00% (0/168 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.IntentIntegrator – 0.00% (0/139 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.util.com.codename1.impl.android.util.Base64 – 0.00% (0/117 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$SocketImpl – 0.00% (0/77 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidTextureView – 0.00% (0/76 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidSurfaceView – 0.00% (0/73 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.LocalNotificationPublisher – 0.00% (0/65 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.FridaDetectionUtil – 0.00% (0/64 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidDB – 0.00% (0/57 lines covered)

✅ Native Android screenshot tests passed.

Native Android coverage

  • 📊 Line coverage: 24.72% (2637/10667 lines covered) [HTML preview] (artifact android-coverage-report, jacocoAndroidReport/html/index.html)
    • Other counters: instruction 24.38% (12270/50336), branch 15.28% (709/4640), complexity 17.35% (732/4220), method 32.67% (593/1815), class 34.65% (105/303)
    • Lowest covered classes
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidContactsManager – 0.00% (0/400 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$Video – 0.00% (0/168 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.IntentIntegrator – 0.00% (0/139 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.util.com.codename1.impl.android.util.Base64 – 0.00% (0/117 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidImplementation$SocketImpl – 0.00% (0/77 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidTextureView – 0.00% (0/76 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidSurfaceView – 0.00% (0/73 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.LocalNotificationPublisher – 0.00% (0/65 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.FridaDetectionUtil – 0.00% (0/64 lines covered)
      • com.codename1.impl.android.com.codename1.impl.android.AndroidDB – 0.00% (0/57 lines covered)

@shai-almog
Copy link
Collaborator

shai-almog commented Dec 19, 2025

iOS screenshot updates

Compared 30 screenshots: 23 matched, 6 updated, 1 missing reference.

  • BrowserComponent — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    BrowserComponent
    Preview info: Preview provided by instrumentation.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as BrowserComponent.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-gradient — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    graphics-draw-gradient
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 844x1835.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-gradient.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-round-rect — missing reference. Reference screenshot missing at /Users/runner/work/CodenameOne/CodenameOne/scripts/ios/screenshots/graphics-draw-round-rect.png.

    graphics-draw-round-rect
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 844x1835.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-round-rect.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-string — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    graphics-draw-string
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 422x918.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-string.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-draw-string-decorated — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    graphics-draw-string-decorated
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 603x1311.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-string-decorated.png in workflow artifacts.

  • graphics-fill-arc — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    graphics-fill-arc
    Preview info: JPEG preview quality 10; JPEG preview quality 10; downscaled to 844x1835.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-fill-arc.png in workflow artifacts.

  • kotlin — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (1206x2622 px, bit depth 8).

    kotlin
    Preview info: Preview provided by instrumentation.
    Full-resolution PNG saved as kotlin.png in workflow artifacts.

Benchmark Results

  • VM Translation Time: 342 seconds
  • Compilation Time: 138 seconds

@shai-almog shai-almog marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2025 16:10
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@shai-almog shai-almog merged commit bfb89ee into master Dec 19, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants