Enterprise systems often integrate multiple identity providers (PIV, LDAP, external IdPs). Without a clear routing mechanism, authentication failures occur due to incorrect flow selection.
flowchart TD
A[User] --> B[Entry Point\nPortal]
B --> C[Routing Layer\nPre Authentication]
C --> D1[PIV Certificate\nAuth]
C --> D2[LDAP Username\nPassword]
C --> D3[External IdP\nSAML OIDC Okta]
D1 --> E[ForgeRock AM]
D2 --> E
D3 --> E
E --> F[Token\nSession Creation]
F --> G[Backend Applications\nSplunk APIs]
A routing layer determines the correct authentication path before the request reaches the authentication engine.
This design avoids common failure patterns in multi-identity provider systems, such as:
- Incorrect realm routing leading to authentication failures
- Misaligned identity provider selection
- Increased complexity inside authentication trees
By separating routing from authentication:
- Authentication flows remain simpler and more maintainable
- Multiple identity providers can be supported cleanly
- Failure isolation becomes easier in enterprise IAM environments
This repository is part of a broader discussion on authentication system design:
👉 Designing Authentication Systems Across Multiple Identity Providers