Skip to content

Conversation

@helizaga
Copy link
Collaborator

@helizaga helizaga commented Jan 14, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated changelog formatting for improved organization and reference tracking.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

helizaga and others added 4 commits January 14, 2026 14:12
The merge from main accidentally reverted the explicit markdown links.
Re-adding them so PRs are clickable on GitHub.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@helizaga helizaga requested a review from NatoBoram as a code owner January 14, 2026 22:28
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Walkthrough

CHANGELOG.md entries in the 2.1.0 Added and Fixed sections have been reformatted to include inline PR references. All bullet points are augmented with corresponding pull request links, maintaining content while enhancing documentation clarity and traceability.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Formatting
CHANGELOG.md
Reformatted bullet entries with inline PR references in 2.1.0 Added and Fixed sections (17 lines modified)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Hoppy changelog day,
PR links now aligned,
Bullets all glow bright,
Traceability refined,
Organized with delight! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: add explicit PR links in changelog' accurately describes the main change: reformatting changelog entries to include inline PR references.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch release/v2.1.0

🧹 Recent nitpick comments
CHANGELOG.md (1)

46-96: Consider adding PR links to previous versions for consistency (optional).

While updating only the 2.1.0 section is perfectly acceptable for this release, you might consider retroactively adding PR links to the 2.0.0 and 1.0.0 sections in a future update. This would create a more consistent historical record and improve traceability across all versions.

This is entirely optional and can be deferred or skipped based on priorities.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3c66fb and e8469ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

38-44: Formatting consistent throughout changelog.

The Fixed section (lines 38–44) follows the same PR reference format as the Added section and maintains proper consistency across all entries. No changes needed.


25-34: Excellent enhancement to changelog traceability. The PR link format is consistent and properly formatted across both Added and Fixed sections, enabling readers to easily trace each change back to its implementation. The documentation aligns with the 2.1.0 release and follows standard changelog practices.

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@helizaga helizaga merged commit 7a315d7 into main Jan 14, 2026
1 check was pending
@helizaga helizaga deleted the release/v2.1.0 branch January 14, 2026 22:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants