Skip to content

300 type sync review#349

Merged
heshamMassoud merged 54 commits into300-refactor-type-and-product-type-togetherfrom
300-type-sync-review
Dec 6, 2018
Merged

300 type sync review#349
heshamMassoud merged 54 commits into300-refactor-type-and-product-type-togetherfrom
300-type-sync-review

Conversation

@heshamMassoud
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Review and Pair proggraming for fixes/review on Type Sync Feature.

@heshamMassoud heshamMassoud merged commit 5377ce7 into 300-refactor-type-and-product-type-together Dec 6, 2018
@heshamMassoud heshamMassoud deleted the 300-type-sync-review branch December 6, 2018 18:04
@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented Dec 6, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #349 into 300-refactor-type-and-product-type-together will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                                Coverage Diff                                @@
##             300-refactor-type-and-product-type-together     #349      +/-   ##
=================================================================================
+ Coverage                                          99.18%   99.24%   +0.06%     
+ Complexity                                          1247     1245       -2     
=================================================================================
  Files                                                112      112              
  Lines                                               3069     3059      -10     
  Branches                                             149      148       -1     
=================================================================================
- Hits                                                3044     3036       -8     
+ Misses                                                13       12       -1     
+ Partials                                              12       11       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../types/utils/FieldDefinitionUpdateActionUtils.java 100% <ø> (ø) 10 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...s/utils/AttributeDefinitionsUpdateActionUtils.java 100% <ø> (ø) 21 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...mmercetools/sync/producttypes/ProductTypeSync.java 100% <ø> (ø) 33 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...c/types/utils/PlainEnumValueUpdateActionUtils.java 100% <ø> (ø) 1 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...cttypes/utils/PlainEnumValueUpdateActionUtils.java 100% <ø> (ø) 4 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...es/utils/AttributeDefinitionUpdateActionUtils.java 100% <ø> (ø) 18 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...pes/utils/LocalizedEnumValueUpdateActionUtils.java 100% <ø> (ø) 1 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...mercetools/sync/services/impl/TypeServiceImpl.java 100% <100%> (+5%) 18 <4> (-1) ⬇️
...in/java/com/commercetools/sync/types/TypeSync.java 100% <100%> (ø) 33 <2> (ø) ⬇️
.../commercetools/sync/types/utils/TypeSyncUtils.java 100% <100%> (ø) 1 <1> (ø) ⬇️
... and 4 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff6d6f7...edf0981. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants