Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #350 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 99.24% 99.24%
Complexity 1245 1245
=========================================
Files 112 112
Lines 3059 3059
Branches 148 148
=========================================
Hits 3036 3036
Misses 12 12
Partials 11 11Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
| 5. Add a summary of the release that is not too detailed or technical. | ||
|
|
||
| 5. Depending on the contents of the release use the subtitles below to | ||
| 6. Depending on the contents of the release use the subtitles below to |
| - **ProductType Sync** - Renamed `LocalizedEnumUpdateActionsUtils` to `LocalizedEnumUpdateActionUtils`. [#302](https://github.com/commercetools/commercetools-sync-java/issues/302) | ||
| - **ProductType Sync** - Renamed `PlainEnumUpdateActionsUtils` to `PlainEnumUpdateActionUtils`. [#302](https://github.com/commercetools/commercetools-sync-java/issues/302) | ||
| - **ProductType Sync** - `EnumsUpdateActionUtils` is now `EnumValuesUpdateActionUtils` and is meant to be **only used internally** by the library. | ||
| Its behaviour is not guaranteed if used externally. [#300](https://github.com/commercetools/commercetools-sync-java/issues/300) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If it should be use internally only why not change class scope instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@butenkor because it's used by two different packages types and productTypes, so it has to be public .
| - **ProductType Sync** - Renamed `LocalizedEnumUpdateActionsUtils` to `LocalizedEnumUpdateActionUtils`. [#302](https://github.com/commercetools/commercetools-sync-java/issues/302) | ||
| - **ProductType Sync** - Renamed `PlainEnumUpdateActionsUtils` to `PlainEnumUpdateActionUtils`. [#302](https://github.com/commercetools/commercetools-sync-java/issues/302) | ||
| - **ProductType Sync** - `EnumsUpdateActionUtils` is now `EnumValuesUpdateActionUtils` and is meant to be **only used internally** by the library. | ||
| Its behaviour is not guaranteed if used externally. [#300](https://github.com/commercetools/commercetools-sync-java/issues/300) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, because this refactoring happened in the type pr. So the commit should be linked in this issue.
ahmetoz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎉 🎉 for 1.0.0, bye bye to beta 👌
Summary