Revise partner reference requirements in terms and conditions

[ebullient]

Updated partner reference guidelines to require mentioning all vendors providing EOL support.

voting group: @commonhaus/cf-egc

Do one of the following:

• React with 👍 (:+1:) or Approve a review if it looks good to you
• React with 👀 (:eyes:) if you're "ok" with it (it may not be your favorite)
• If you think it needs discussion or revision:
  • Create a review, add your comments and require changes
  • Use the +- button to make a suggestion (instead of just adding a comment).

[haus-rules-bot]

🗳️ 6 of 19 members of @commonhaus/cf-egc have voted (reaction or review, quorum=2/3).

Reaction	Total	Team	Voting members
approve	7	5	FDelporte, Naros, cealsair, ebullient, kenfinnigan
ok	1	1	gavinking

Additional input (🙏 🥰 🙌):
dmlloyd(👍), eitch(👍)

The following votes were not counted (duplicates):
cealsair(👍)

A vote manager comment containing vote::result will close the vote.

[yrodiere]

I think "fair" kind of implies "mention everyone" already, but okay, more clarity is better :)

[gavinking]

I think "fair" kind of implies "mention everyone" already, but okay, more clarity is better :)

Actually I think "all vendors" is too strong; we should be allowed to exclude vendors we think are spammy or scammy.

[yrodiere]

I think "fair" kind of implies "mention everyone" already, but okay, more clarity is better :)

Actually I think "all vendors" is too strong; we should be allowed to exclude vendors we think are spammy or scammy.

"all vendors which provide EOL support" is meant as "all vendors which are part of the open-source sustainability initiative", I believe. I agree we want to avoid spammy/scummy vendors, but if these manage to be part of that initiative, we've failed elsewhere...

[gavinking]

"all vendors which provide EOL support" is meant as "all vendors which are part of the open-source sustainability initiative", I believe.

If that's what it means then that's what it should say, no?

[yrodiere]

Using the suggestion feature on behalf of Gavin...

Suggested change

	If a project chooses to reference an individual partner, then the project must reference all vendors which provide EOL support in a fair and non-misleading manner consistent with the Foundation’s Trademark Policy and Code of Conduct.
	If a project chooses to reference an individual partner, then the project must reference all vendors part of the open-source sustainability initiative which provide EOL support for this project in a fair and non-misleading manner consistent with the Foundation’s Trademark Policy and Code of Conduct.