Skip to content

Require cppinterop v1.9.0 for next xeus-cpp#468

Merged
vgvassilev merged 1 commit intocompiler-research:mainfrom
mcbarton:require-cppinterop-1.9.0
Mar 27, 2026
Merged

Require cppinterop v1.9.0 for next xeus-cpp#468
vgvassilev merged 1 commit intocompiler-research:mainfrom
mcbarton:require-cppinterop-1.9.0

Conversation

@mcbarton
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

There are several PRs currently open that require cppinterop v1.9.0 . This PR makes cppinterop v1.9.0 the new minimum now that is has been released.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Mar 26, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.28%. Comparing base (96beb1c) to head (98271d5).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #468   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.28%   80.28%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines         847      847           
  Branches       78       78           
=======================================
  Hits          680      680           
  Misses        167      167           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@anutosh491
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I just updated cppinterop on emscripten-forge so that's fixed now !

@mcbarton mcbarton force-pushed the require-cppinterop-1.9.0 branch from 7df653e to 98271d5 Compare March 27, 2026 07:43
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vgvassilev vgvassilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@vgvassilev vgvassilev merged commit 506b645 into compiler-research:main Mar 27, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants