Skip to content

Remove release target of renaming archives checksums file#1334

Merged
MuweiHe merged 2 commits intomainfrom
remove-rename-checksums
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

Remove release target of renaming archives checksums file#1334
MuweiHe merged 2 commits intomainfrom
remove-rename-checksums

Conversation

@MuweiHe
Copy link
Contributor

@MuweiHe MuweiHe commented Jun 24, 2022

Checklist

  1. [CRUCIAL] Is the change for CP or CCloud functionalities that are already live in prod?
    • yes: ok

What

We used to rename it from 2.x.x to v2.x.x as the auto upload of goreleaser doesn't include the v, and our install script requires that v. The new gorelease block we have now has already renamed it when uploading checksums files (after cating checksums of linux build), and this block would overwrite that.

Keeping this patch block in case we need anything in the future.

Also upload the cated checksums to github to overwrite the previous one without linux checksum.

References

Test & Review

@MuweiHe MuweiHe requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2022 22:43
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 💯 We should fix the naming in the next major release. It's confusing how archives and binaries don't use the same format. 😕

@MuweiHe
Copy link
Contributor Author

MuweiHe commented Jun 24, 2022

Nice! 💯 We should fix the naming in the next major release. It's confusing how archives and binaries don't use the same format. 😕

Yes. We might work on the installer script. All releases we have now have this discrepancy. We would want installer to work on previous ones still.

@MuweiHe MuweiHe merged commit ca4454c into main Jun 27, 2022
@MuweiHe MuweiHe deleted the remove-rename-checksums branch June 27, 2022 19:26
Anshul Goyal (Anshul-Goyal) pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants