Skip to content

[SD-1631] Add activation privilege to update command#1645

Merged
Brian Strauch (brianstrauch) merged 10 commits intomainfrom
sd-1631-grant-activation
Jan 12, 2023
Merged

[SD-1631] Add activation privilege to update command#1645
Brian Strauch (brianstrauch) merged 10 commits intomainfrom
sd-1631-grant-activation

Conversation

@xiangxin72
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  1. [CRUCIAL] Is the change for CP or CCloud functionalities that are already live in prod?
    • yes: ok

What

Allow update command to accept a --activation-privilege parameter, for user to specify whether to grant or revoke the activation privileges.

This parameter is already supported at server side

References

Test & Review

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the future, we'll hopefully have RBAC roles that will allow users to accomplish the same thing with confluent iam rbac role-binding create. But until then, this looks good.

@brianstrauch Brian Strauch (brianstrauch) changed the title add activaiton privilge to update command Add activation privilege to update command Jan 11, 2023
@xiangxin72 Xin Xiang (xiangxin72) changed the title Add activation privilege to update command SD-1631 Add activation privilege to update command Jan 12, 2023
@xiangxin72 Xin Xiang (xiangxin72) changed the title SD-1631 Add activation privilege to update command [SD-1631] Add activation privilege to update command Jan 12, 2023
@xiangxin72
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks Brian Strauch (@brianstrauch) for the feedback, a local test shows this worked fine to grant/revoke privileges. Can you take another pass? Not sure this can make today's release

@brianstrauch Brian Strauch (brianstrauch) deleted the sd-1631-grant-activation branch January 12, 2023 22:36
yao-gu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2023
Co-authored-by: Brian Strauch <bstrauch@confluent.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants