Skip to content

Conversation

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Remove an outdated comment on the absence of exit-code propagation when running K8s workloads in systemd. The podman-kube@ systemd template is using default restart policy of the system. The exit-code propagation is tested in other tests, so we can keep the logic as is.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Remove an outdated comment on the absence of exit-code propagation when
running K8s workloads in systemd.  The `podman-kube@` systemd template
is using default restart policy of the system.  The exit-code
propagation is tested in other tests, so we can keep the logic as is.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none labels Jun 12, 2023
@vrothberg vrothberg marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2023 11:21
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 12, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 12, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 12, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold

Thank you!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 12, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2023
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 12, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e02fa23 into containers:main Jun 12, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 11, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 11, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants