-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
test/system: remove deprecated cgroupsv1 skip check #27562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Remove skip_if_rootless_cgroupsv1 call from quadlet tests since cgroupsv1 is deprecated and no longer needs special handling Signed-off-by: Jan Rodák <hony.com@seznam.cz>
lsm5
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
whoops, looks like I missed that one.
LGTM. Thanks
flouthoc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
flouthoc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, Honny1, lsm5 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This PR fixes failing CI on the main branch.
Remove
skip_if_rootless_cgroupsv1call from quadlet tests since cgroupsv1 is deprecated and no longer needs special handling.Checklist
Ensure you have completed the following checklist for your pull request to be reviewed:
commits. (
git commit -s). (If needed, usegit commit -s --amend). The author email must matchthe sign-off email address. See CONTRIBUTING.md
for more information.
Fixes: #00000in commit message (if applicable)make validatepr(format/lint checks)Noneif no user-facing changes)Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?