Skip to content

feat: Made the creation on the content type optional for the Image Focal App []#10548

Merged
Sam Ashley (sam-is-content) merged 2 commits intocontentful:masterfrom
shanonplace:feature/make-type-creation-optional
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

feat: Made the creation on the content type optional for the Image Focal App []#10548
Sam Ashley (sam-is-content) merged 2 commits intocontentful:masterfrom
shanonplace:feature/make-type-creation-optional

Conversation

@shanonplace
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Modified the code to now allow the installer to choose to either create a new content type, or to use an existing one, provided it has a JSON and image field in it

Did this for Rob Remington for the Blueprints work

@shanonplace Shanon Place (shanonplace) requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2026 00:36
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sam-is-content Sam Ashley (sam-is-content) left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great! Thanks for submitting it.

@sam-is-content Sam Ashley (sam-is-content) changed the title Made the creation on the content type optional for the Image Focal App feat: Made the creation on the content type optional for the Image Focal App [] Feb 17, 2026
@sam-is-content
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like the snapshots also need to be updated

@shanonplace Shanon Place (shanonplace) force-pushed the feature/make-type-creation-optional branch from bd027f7 to ea2b023 Compare February 18, 2026 04:50
@shanonplace
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Looks like the snapshots also need to be updated

OK that's done and I checked the tests ran locally, I also rebased the branch against master

@sam-is-content Sam Ashley (sam-is-content) merged commit 33a85ca into contentful:master Feb 18, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants