Skip to content
Andreas Ernst edited this page Mar 5, 2026 · 26 revisions

Introduction

Portal implements a react portal framework supporting microfrontends vastly simplifying implementation efforts since a number of technical challenges every application has to solve are already part of the framework.

  • integration of a DI solution
  • centralized error handling ( including error boundaries )
  • session handling
  • optional i18n solution
  • meta-data based approach that allows for
    • filtering of available features according to authentication, authorization or other aspects ( e.g. feature flags )
    • automatic router configuration according to the metadata
    • dynamic navigation features that are based on the meta-data and custom rules
    • feature outlets that cover both local and federated components and allow for custom async preloading logic ( e.g. i18n loading )
  • custom application configurations with support for both client and server side logic

While the framework supports enterprise portals with dynamic microfrontends - and server side configuration mechanisms - as one extreme it also covers small local only applications without significant coding and rampup overhead, making it a one-size-fits-all framework.

Basic Solution Idea

The main idea for most of the mechanisms is that modules expose meta-data of "what is inside", by annotating available "features" ( named components used internally or part of the routing ) with special decorators.

@Feature({
  id: 'public-navigation',
  label: 'Navigation',
  visibility: ["public"], // visible without a session
  features: [],
  permissions: []
  tags: ['portal'], // needed to identify this special feature
  path: '/'
})
export class PublicNavigationFeature extends React.Component {
    ...
}

A parser - as part of the build - will locate those features and generate a manifest.json which can be processed by different mechanisms.

{
  "id": "shell",
  "label": "Shell",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "moduleName": "ApplicationModule",
  "sourceFile": "apps/shell/src/main.tsx",
  "description": "Shell",
  "features": [
     {
      "id": "public-navigation",
      "label": "Navigation",
      "path": "",
      "visibility": [
        "public"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "portal"
      ],
      "features": [
      ],
      "permissions": [
      ],
      "component": "PublicNavigationFeature",
      "sourceFile": "apps/app/src/navigation/PublicNavigation.tsx",
    },
    ...
  ],
  ...
}

If we think of a setup including a shell and federated microfrontends, those manifests are the basis for an application configuration by merging different manifests according to custom rules and setups and booting the application with a tailored configuration. Possible rules - that are typically executed on the server side - are rules

  • regarding static configurations ( enabling/disabling microfrontends or features per admin ui )
  • regarding roles and permissions
  • regarding feature flags
  • regarding client characteristics ( e.g. screen resolution )

As already stated, an enterprise portal will have the corresponding data management, services and respective administrative interfaces to compute custom configurations on the server side. As the framework should also cover small apps, a standalone purely client driven approach is also possible. So different scenarios are possible:

Standalone applciation

portal_local drawio

Microfrontend applciation reading remote manifets

portal_reading_manifest drawio

Microfrontend application with server side configuration

portal_server drawio

Lets' look at the details

Module Setup

Let's see how to boot an application. First thing we need to do is to setup the di container and add a couple of instances inside of the main "module"

@Module({
  id: 'shell',
  label: 'Shell',
  version: '1.0.0',
  description: 'Shell',
  name: '',
})
export class ApplicationModule extends AbstractModule {
  @create()
  createSessionManager() : SessionManager<any,any> {
    return new SessionManager(new DummyAuthenticationService()); // for now, would be OIDC in reality
  }

  @create()
  createDeploymentLoader(portalService: PortalService) : DeploymentLoader {
    return new EmptyDeploymentLoader() // only local, so far 
  }

  @create()
  createDeploymentManager(loader: DeploymentLoader, featureRegistry: FeatureRegistry) : DeploymentManager {
      return new DeploymentManager(
        featureRegistry,
        loader,
        manifest as Manifest // that's the local genaretd manifest.json
      );
  }

  // lifecycle

  @onRunning()
  async onRunning(featureRegistry: FeatureRegistry, deploymentManager: DeploymentManager, sessionManager: SessionManager<any,any>, routerManager: RouterManager) {
      // load deployment

      await deploymentManager.loadDeployment({
          application: "portal",
          client: deploymentManager.clientInfo(),
      });

      // the root if the router will be a feature with tag "portal" and the correct visibility

      routerManager.setRoot(featureRegistry.finder()
        .withTag('portal')
        .withVisibility(sessionManager.hasSession())
        .findOne());
        
      await sessionManager.init();
    }
}

// create environment

export const createEnvironment = async () : Promise<Environment> => {
    const environment = new Environment({module: ApplicationModule})

    await environment.start()

    return environment
}

The crucial parts are

DeploymentManager

The DeploymentManager which is responsible to compute a merged manifest.json. Since we are still completely local, it will only return the local manifest.json

FeatureRegistry

A FeatureRegistry collects all features and will be filled with the gathered information of the deployment manager. Since it knows about all registered components - local or remote - a <FeatureOutlet> component is now available that renders any registered feature by name, which is the basis for a number of mechanisms.

RoutingManager

The RoutingManager will compute dynamic routes based on the provided features and a handpicked "root" feature The routing logic will simply pick all features that have a defined "path" and add them as children - inserting a feature outlet - to the desired root feature, which in this case has a defined tag "portal" and has a visibility property that matches the current session state.

Launching the application is now just a couple lines of code.

Main File

const environment = await createEnvironment();

const root = createRoot(document.getElementById('root')!);
root.render(
    <EnvironmentContext.Provider value={environment}>
      <App />
    </EnvironmentContext.Provider>
    );

Application

while the application

export class App extends React.Component {
    routerManager!: RouterManager;

    static contextType = EnvironmentContext

    declare context: Environment

    async componentDidMount() { 
        this.routerManager = this.context.get(RouterManager);
    }

    override render() {
        return (
            this.routerManager.renderRouter()
        );
    }
}

Navigation

simply delegates to rendering to the defined routes. So what is the root? Well, a specific feature which acts as the main page typically offering navigation possibilities ( as a side bar ).

The interesting part, is that since we already have the complete meta-data available, we dont need to hardcode the navigation entries anymore, but can rely on a couple of conventions to list the available routes.

Example:

const features = featureRegistry
    .finder()
    .withPath()
    .withoutParent()
    .withVisibility(sessionManager.hasSession())
    .withTag('menu')
    .find();

In this case all features, that have the corresponding visibility status matching the session state and have a tag "menu", will be listed as corresponding <Link>s.

Isn't that awsome?

Ok, but we promised microfrontends as well, were are they?

Federated modules will take a similar approach, by defining a root module, exposing a manifest.json, etc. The main application will only need to change the corresponding deployment loader to integrate it.

  return new RemoteDeploymentLoader([
        { name: 'microfrontend', url: 'http://localhost:3001' },
      ]);

In this case, the manifest is fetched dynamically from the known url and merged with the local manifest.

This is good enough for a local environment used for development purposes, in production the logic would be handed over to a server component that is aware of different microfrontends and configurations also including more sophisticated logic to filter features according to feature flags, etc.

Showcase

A showcase app shows a shell and a microfreontend.

image

API Docs

API docs are available here

Clone this wiki locally