Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 1, 2022

Bumps jsonschema from 4.16.0 to 4.17.3.

Release notes

Sourced from jsonschema's releases.

v4.17.3

  • Fix instantiating validators with cached refs to boolean schemas rather than objects (#1018).
  • Empty strings are not valid relative JSON Pointers (aren't valid under the RJP format).
  • Durations without (trailing) units are not valid durations (aren't valid under the duration format). This involves changing the dependency used for validating durations (from isoduration to isodate).

Full Changelog: python-jsonschema/jsonschema@v4.17.2...v4.17.3

v4.17.1

  • The error message when using unevaluatedProperties with a non-trivial schema value (i.e. something other than false) has been improved (#996).

Full Changelog: python-jsonschema/jsonschema@v4.17.0...v4.17.1

v4.17.0

  • The check_schema method on jsonschema.protocols.Validator instances now enables format validation by default when run. This can catch some additional invalid schemas (e.g. containing invalid regular expressions) where the issue is indeed uncovered by validating against the metaschema with format validation enabled as an assertion.
  • The jsonschema CLI (along with jsonschema.cli the module) are now deprecated. Use check-jsonschema instead, which can be installed via pip install check-jsonschema and found here.
  • Make ErrorTree have a more grammatically correct repr.

Full Changelog: python-jsonschema/jsonschema@v4.16.0...v4.17.0

Changelog

Sourced from jsonschema's changelog.

v4.17.3

  • Fix instantiating validators with cached refs to boolean schemas rather than objects (#1018).

v4.17.2

  • Empty strings are not valid relative JSON Pointers (aren't valid under the RJP format).
  • Durations without (trailing) units are not valid durations (aren't valid under the duration format). This involves changing the dependency used for validating durations (from isoduration to isodate).

v4.17.1

  • The error message when using unevaluatedProperties with a non-trivial schema value (i.e. something other than false) has been improved (#996).

v4.17.0

  • The check_schema method on jsonschema.protocols.Validator instances now enables format validation by default when run. This can catch some additional invalid schemas (e.g. containing invalid regular expressions) where the issue is indeed uncovered by validating against the metaschema with format validation enabled as an assertion.
  • The jsonschema CLI (along with jsonschema.cli the module) are now deprecated. Use check-jsonschema instead, which can be installed via pip install check-jsonschema and found here <https://github.com/python-jsonschema/check-jsonschema>_.

v4.16.1

  • Make ErrorTree have a more grammatically correct repr.
Commits
  • dbc3982 Fix instantiating validators with cached refs-to-bool schemas.
  • 7ebe161 Try fixing more Sphinx refs which fail only on Ubuntu...
  • cdf0c71 Update pre-commit hooks.
  • e868bfe Durations without trailing units aren't valid durations.
  • 24d1328 Empty strings are not valid relative JSON pointers.
  • bd12369 Minor fix for test case class names (for format tests).
  • fb203a5 Merge commit '97954adeb0fbb3d4499580d897de507d3ab0d919'
  • 97954ad Squashed 'json/' changes from 9251ebff1..78c888273
  • 46fdb98 v4.17.1 -> CHANGELOG
  • 000dd3d Remove making believe we are ReadTheDocs in CI builds.
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2022 08:03
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Dec 1, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 1, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 84.54% // Head: 84.54% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (de47727) compared to base (8ce005e).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #405   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.54%   84.54%           
========================================
  Files           33       33           
  Lines         2575     2575           
  Branches       349      349           
========================================
  Hits          2177     2177           
  Misses         259      259           
  Partials       139      139           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/pip/jsonschema-4.17.3 branch from 879843b to 64176e3 Compare December 5, 2022 13:08
@svillegas-cdd svillegas-cdd requested review from a team and jtrobles-cdd December 5, 2022 13:30
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/pip/jsonschema-4.17.3 branch from 64176e3 to de47727 Compare December 5, 2022 14:56
Copy link
Member

@jtrobles-cdd jtrobles-cdd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please recompile Python dependencies using Python 3.7.

make python-deps-sync-check

@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/pip/jsonschema-4.17.3 branch from de47727 to 728d779 Compare December 6, 2022 13:26
@svillegas-cdd svillegas-cdd force-pushed the dependabot/pip/jsonschema-4.17.3 branch from 728d779 to 47ad72f Compare December 20, 2022 13:24
Bumps [jsonschema](https://github.com/python-jsonschema/jsonschema) from 4.16.0 to 4.17.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/python-jsonschema/jsonschema/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/python-jsonschema/jsonschema/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst)
- [Commits](python-jsonschema/jsonschema@v4.16.0...v4.17.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: jsonschema
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@svillegas-cdd svillegas-cdd force-pushed the dependabot/pip/jsonschema-4.17.3 branch from 47ad72f to ce1d62f Compare January 10, 2023 14:11
@svillegas-cdd svillegas-cdd merged commit ffd294f into develop Jan 23, 2023
@svillegas-cdd svillegas-cdd deleted the dependabot/pip/jsonschema-4.17.3 branch January 23, 2023 13:55
@jtrobles-cdd jtrobles-cdd mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants