Skip to content

Conversation

@tuanwannafly
Copy link
Contributor

@tuanwannafly tuanwannafly commented Jan 4, 2026

Related Issue
Closes #470

Summary
Checklist
Tests pass (pytest tests/)
MVP label added if closing MVP issue
Update "Cortex -h" (if needed)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Updated contributor license agreement signers list: added a new signer and corrected minor formatting in an existing email entry.
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new entry to the Contributor License Agreement signers list.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new CLA signer entry is added to the individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json. The entry records Tuan Wanna's contributor license agreement signature with their GitHub username, email address, signature date, and CLA version.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CLA Signer Registry
\.github/cla-signers\.json
Added individual signer entry: Tuan Wanna (tuanwannafly) with email tunawillgetit1030@gmail.com, signed 2026-01-03 under CLA v1.0

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Anshgrover23
  • Suyashd999
  • Sahilbhatane

Poem

🐰 A carrot-loving rabbit hops with glee,
New signer Tuan joins the CLA spree!
With username bright and email so true,
The contributor list grows, and grows, and grew! 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and concisely describes the main change: adding a new CLA signer named Tuna to the signers list.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes the related issue, summary section, and mentions checklist items, though formatting is imperfect with incomplete checkbox syntax.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The code changes fully satisfy issue #470 requirements by adding the individual CLA signer entry with the correct name, GitHub username, email, and signature date.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are directly related to the linked issue #470; the PR adds the requested CLA signer entry with no unrelated modifications.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2026

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

How to Sign

  1. Read the CLA document
  2. Open a CLA signature request
  3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
  4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 4, 2026

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)

171-172: Optional: Remove extra blank lines.

Two blank lines before the closing bracket are unusual. Consider removing them for consistency with the rest of the file, though this doesn't affect JSON validity.

🔎 Suggested cleanup
-    }
-

-
+    }
   ],
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e75297 and e6024f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/cla-signers.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)

162-170: LGTM! CLA signer entry correctly added.

The new entry for Tuan Wanna is properly formatted with all required fields and matches the information from issue #470. The data is accurate and consistent with the existing entries.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 merged commit 29c51cc into cortexlinux:main Jan 4, 2026
14 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CLA Signature: TuanTuna625

2 participants