Skip to content

[feat] [evaluation] generalize evaluator skip rule to intercept rule#522

Merged
xiaowuxiaowu1 merged 3 commits into
feat/coze/2.5from
feat/evaluator-intercept-rule-generalize
May 14, 2026
Merged

[feat] [evaluation] generalize evaluator skip rule to intercept rule#522
xiaowuxiaowu1 merged 3 commits into
feat/coze/2.5from
feat/evaluator-intercept-rule-generalize

Conversation

@xiaowuxiaowu1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Rename ShouldSkip to ShouldIntercept across interfaces, implementations, and tests. Add RunStatus field to EvaluatorOutputData so that intercept rules can control both score and status of evaluator records.

What type of PR is this?

Check the PR title

  • This PR title match the format: [<type>][<scope>] <description>. For example: [fix][backend] flaky fix
  • The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
  • Add documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level.
  • This PR is written in English. PRs not in English will not be reviewed.

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese)

en:
zh(optional):

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Rename ShouldSkip to ShouldIntercept across interfaces, implementations,
and tests. Add RunStatus field to EvaluatorOutputData so that intercept
rules can control both score and status of evaluator records.
@mocayo mocayo changed the title feat(evaluation): generalize evaluator skip rule to intercept rule [feat] [evaluation] generalize evaluator skip rule to intercept rule May 14, 2026
…emantics

Align variable names and comments with the intercept semantics instead
of the legacy skip terminology.
@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

…return value

Align ShouldIntercept return style with Run method - status is now an
independent return value instead of being embedded in the DO struct.
@xiaowuxiaowu1 xiaowuxiaowu1 merged commit ad5f480 into feat/coze/2.5 May 14, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
@xiaowuxiaowu1 xiaowuxiaowu1 deleted the feat/evaluator-intercept-rule-generalize branch May 14, 2026 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants