[atomics.syn] Reword the freestanding specification #8411
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tkoeppe
reviewed
Nov 4, 2025
Contributor
|
Please fix the commit message to include the standard "Fixes NB ..." phrase. |
dalg24
force-pushed
the
atomic_header_mostly_freestanding
branch
from
3f7e287 to
a1cff79
Compare
Fixes NB US 191-307 (C++26 CD). Mark the `<atomic>` header `// mostly freestanding`, remove all the `// freestanding` comments, and add `// hosted` comments for `atomic_signed_lock_free` and `atomic_unsigned_lock_free`.
tkoeppe
force-pushed
the
atomic_header_mostly_freestanding
branch
from
a1cff79 to
9c95a6e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mark the
<atomic>header// mostly freestanding, remove all the// freestandingcomments, and add// hostedcomments foratomic_signed_lock_freeandatomic_unsigned_lock_free.Fix https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/882
cc @jwakely