Skip to content

Conversation

@mvandeberg
Copy link
Contributor

@mvandeberg mvandeberg commented Jan 22, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added an automated code review configuration to standardize quality checks: enables auto-reviews and auto-replies, high-level summaries, sequence diagrams, review status tracking, expanded changed-file summaries, pre-merge check warnings, and path-specific documentation guidance with exclusions for CI/build/docs/test areas.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new .coderabbit.yaml configuration that enables automated CodeRabbit review features (auto-reply, auto-review), sets language and branch filters, configures review outputs (summaries, sequence diagrams, poems, status), defines pre-merge check modes, excludes certain paths, and adds C++ path-specific documentation guidance.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration
\.coderabbit\.yaml
New configuration file adding CodeRabbit review settings: language: en, chat.auto_reply: true, automated reviews with title/draft/base-branch filters, enabled review outputs (high-level summaries, sequence diagrams, poems, review status, changed-files summary), collapse walkthrough, pre-merge check modes (description: warning, docstrings: off), path exclusions (benches, build, context, doc, meta, papers, test), and C++ path-specific documentation instructions for **/*.{cpp,hpp}.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

A config file hops into view,
Lines of guidance neat and spry,
Reviews awaken, diagrams too,
I nibble notes and watch them fly. 🐇✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "Configure code rabbit" is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terminology that doesn't convey meaningful information about what aspect of CodeRabbit configuration is being implemented. Consider a more specific title such as "Add CodeRabbit configuration with review automation and path-specific guidance" to clearly convey the main changes.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mvandeberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link

cppalliance-bot commented Jan 22, 2026

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://105.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/index.html

If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL.

2026-01-22 22:43:12 UTC

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 29-34: Docstring coverage warnings are still flagging code in
"detail" namespaces because path_filters can't match namespace-level constructs;
update the .coderabbit.yaml pre_merge_checks.docstrings config to either disable
the check (set pre_merge_checks.docstrings.mode to off) or add explicit rule
support to ignore detail namespaces (e.g., add a docstrings rule to exclude
symbols/namespaces named "detail" or a custom_rule that recognizes and skips
detail-namespace symbols when evaluating coverage); target the
pre_merge_checks.docstrings configuration and any path_instructions/docstrings
rule blocks to implement the chosen option.

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link

cppalliance-bot commented Jan 22, 2026

GCOVR code coverage report https://105.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/gcovr/index.html
LCOV code coverage report https://105.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/genhtml/index.html
Coverage Diff https://105.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/gcovr/coverage_diff.txt

Build time: 2026-01-22 22:52:35 UTC

@mvandeberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@mvandeberg mvandeberg marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2026 22:49
@mvandeberg mvandeberg merged commit 0cd4419 into cppalliance:develop Jan 22, 2026
15 checks passed
@mvandeberg mvandeberg deleted the chore/coderabbit-config branch January 22, 2026 23:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants