refs #11603 - deprecated --enable=information implicitly enabling missingInclude#4865
Conversation
|
I would prefer to simply remove this dependency since most people might have never seen any of these warnings before because of https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11283 which was just fixed in this dev cycle. But some people might have always run this with only a single job because of system limitations or a certain use case which does not require it or doesn't make sense for (IDE integration comes to mind) So I do not think that we should simply change the behavior. https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11603 shows that might have a sudden unexpected effect but it can be worked around easily and there might be cases (as in the ticket) where this will actually expose flawed configurations of the analysis which might lead to false positives and false negatives. So at the end we should have more consistency, transparency, usability and hopefully even better results. On a side note: I hope to get all the deprecations we should do into this dev cycle so people have one point where they have to change their configurations and we don't need them to do adjustments with several releases. Also I chose a shorter span for Windows-only stuff as those users can more easily update to a newer version (and possibly have to do it manually anyways as no common packaging system) whereas general or Linux-specific changes should have a longer period as people might have to rely on their distro providing an update and that might just happen when an actual new distro version drops which is usually around 6 months. There could be the way of a Snap or Flatpak package but the first is totally out-of-date and not provided by us and I am not aware of the latter. Something to look into via https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/10772. I could have published all of them already but since they all touch |
|
This also partially fixes https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/10697 |
2 participants
No description provided.