Conversation
|
@firewave @amai2012 @rikardfalkeborn @PKEuS @keinflue @chrchr-github @HolgiHo @orbitcowboy @Dmitry-Me @dummyunit @patrickdowling @jannick0 @IOBYTE @katahiromz @larslj @JIghtuse @JohnSiegel @mptre @diamante0018 @bavison @al42and @josecm @Ken-Patrick @versat @o-bolshakov @mitsujin @diorcety @rsBNT @matthiaskrgr @x29a @uburuntu @mathbunnyru @zingsheim @svenpanne I would like to change the license for simplecpp to something that will be easier to use commercially. Basically my philosophy is that companies should be allowed to use and modify simplecpp source code as they want. My philosophy is that no attribution is required; they can use simplecpp without saying it to anybody. Please feel free to comment if you have some objections. I googled and thought that 0BSD might be a good match. However if you have better ideas please let me know. |
|
Feel free to change the licence. |
|
My contribution was very minor. It's fine by me to change the license. |
|
Looks good to me, no objections on my side 👍 |
|
No objection from me. |
|
Looks good to me as well. Keep up your great work! |
|
LGTM. |
|
lgtm
Le 16 décembre 2023 11:33:29 GMT+01:00, "Daniel Marjamäki" ***@***.***> a écrit :
…
@firewave @amai2012 @rikardfalkeborn @PKEuS @keinflue @chrchr-github @HolgiHo @orbitcowboy @Dmitry-Me @dummyunit @patrickdowling @jannick0 @IOBYTE @katahiromz @larslj @JIghtuse @JohnSiegel @mptre @diamante0018 @bavison @al42and @josecm @Ken-Patrick @versat @o-bolshakov @mitsujin @diorcety @rsBNT @matthiaskrgr @x29a @uburuntu @mathbunnyru @zingsheim @svenpanne
I would like to change the license for simplecpp to something that will be easier to use commercially.
Basically my philosophy is that companies should be allowed to use and modify simplecpp source code. My philosophy is that no attribution is required; they can use simplecpp without saying it to anybody.
Please feel free to comment if you have some objections.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#332 (comment)
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Ok by me. Keep up the great work @danmar ! |
|
LGTM. Thank you for all your efforts! |
|
Hi Daniel, BSD zero clause looks like a good choice for your purpose. Thanks for your work! Respectfully, Oleg |
|
Lgtm |
|
No objection from me. |
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM. Good luck with simplecpp and cppcheck! |
|
LGTM |
|
Very happy with the proposal, and thanks for asking even those of us who have only played a minor part! |
|
ok I will merge this now.. and release a simplecpp with this license soon.. |
|
OK for me, too.
Sorry for the late reply
Frank
Am Samstag, dem 16.12.2023 um 02:33 -0800 schrieb Daniel Marjamäki:
… @firewave @amai2012 @rikardfalkeborn @PKEuS @keinflue @chrchr-github
@HolgiHo @orbitcowboy @Dmitry-Me @dummyunit @patrickdowling @jannick0
@IOBYTE @katahiromz @larslj @JIghtuse @JohnSiegel @mptre
@diamante0018 @bavison @al42and @josecm @Ken-Patrick @versat
@o-bolshakov @mitsujin @diorcety @rsBNT @matthiaskrgr @x29a @uburuntu
@mathbunnyru @zingsheim @svenpanne
I would like to change the license for simplecpp to something that
will be easier to use commercially.
Basically my philosophy is that companies should be allowed to use
and modify simplecpp source code. My philosophy is that no
attribution is required; they can use simplecpp without saying it to
anybody.
Please feel free to comment if you have some objections.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
20 participants
No description provided.