-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Home
The Genesis Methodology for AI Concept Validation
VerifiMind PEAS is an open-source AI concept validation framework that uses a multi-agent methodology to assess the innovation potential, ethical implications, and security risks of AI applications before they're built.
Think of it as a "concept validator" that helps AI builders avoid costly mistakes and ethical pitfalls.
VerifiMind PEAS uses three specialized AI agents working together:
- Evaluates innovation potential and strategic value
- Identifies market opportunities and competitive advantages
- Assesses technical feasibility and scalability
- Score: 0-10 (Innovation Score)
- Evaluates ethical implications and Z-Protocol compliance
- Identifies potential harms and discrimination risks
- Has VETO POWER to stop harmful concepts
- Score: 0-10 (Ethics Score)
- Evaluates cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities
- Identifies attack vectors and security weaknesses
- Recommends security mitigations
- Score: 0-10 (Security Score)
80+ AI concept validations across 11 industry categories:
| Category | Concepts | Avg Score | Approval Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climate & Sustainability | 10 | 7.6/10 | 100% ⭐ |
| Education | 4 | 7.5/10 | 100% |
| Gaming & Entertainment | 10 | 7.3/10 | 70% |
| Government & Public Services | 10 | 7.1/10 | 70% |
| Developer Tools | 5 | 7.0/10 | 80% |
| Social Media & Communication | 10 | 6.8/10 | 40% |
| Fintech & Banking | 10 | 6.8/10 | 60% |
| E-commerce & Retail | 10 | 6.7/10 | 40% |
| Business & Productivity | 5 | 6.8/10 | 40% |
| Healthcare & Wellness | 3 | 5.7/10 | 67% |
| Creative Work | 3 | 6.9/10 | 33% |
Browse all validations: Validation Database
Explore our database of 80+ validated AI concepts to:
- Get market insights
- Learn from vetoed concepts
- Find high-opportunity areas
- Avoid ethical pitfalls
Start here: Validation Database
Learn how the Genesis Methodology works:
Use the MCP server to validate your AI concept:
Help grow the validation database:
- Contributing Guide
- Submit your validations
- Improve the methodology
- Multi-agent validation (X, Z, CS)
- Chain of Thought reasoning
- Prior reasoning integration
- Trinity synthesis
- Z Agent can veto harmful concepts
- 6 ethical red lines defined
- Z-Protocol compliance required
- 20% of concepts vetoed (working!)
- All code on GitHub
- 80+ validations published
- Methodology documented
- Community-driven
- 11 industry categories
- 240+ agent analyses
- Approval rates by category
- Risk assessments
- Methodology - How the Genesis Methodology works
- Agent Guides - Detailed agent documentation
- Validation Database - Browse all 80+ validations
- How to Use - Step-by-step usage guide
- Contributing - How to contribute
- Case Studies - Deep dives into validations
- FAQ - Common questions
- Validate concepts before building
- Identify ethical risks early
- Get security recommendations
- Avoid costly mistakes
- Assess AI startup risks
- Evaluate ethical implications
- Understand market potential
- Due diligence support
- Study AI ethics in practice
- Analyze validation patterns
- Contribute to methodology
- Publish findings
- Understand AI risks
- Inform regulation
- Identify harmful patterns
- Support responsible AI
- 80+ validations completed
- 11 industry categories covered
- 240+ agent analyses generated
- 20% veto rate (Z Agent working!)
- 100% approval in Climate & Sustainability
- Open source and community-driven
- GitHub: VerifiMind-PEAS
- Discussions: GitHub Discussions
- Issues: Report Issues
- Smithery: MCP Server Listing
- Browse the Validation Database
- Learn the Methodology
- Install the MCP Server
- Validate your AI concept
- Contribute back to the community
Let's build responsible AI together! 🌟
VerifiMind PEAS documentation · Current status · Live health · Public statements · MIT License
Runtime versions, models, routing, tool availability, policies, metrics, and deployment facts are owned by their linked live or release-bound sources.
Start Here
Operator Playbook
Textbook
Trust & Transparency
Evidence & Research
Project Links