Skip to content

fix(deps): bump authlib to >=1.6.12 to patch PYSEC-2026-188#6027

Merged
greysonlalonde merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gl/fix/bump-authlib-cve
Jun 3, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): bump authlib to >=1.6.12 to patch PYSEC-2026-188#6027
greysonlalonde merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gl/fix/bump-authlib-cve

Conversation

@greysonlalonde
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@greysonlalonde greysonlalonde commented Jun 3, 2026

PYSEC-2026-188 affects authlib <1.6.12. Workspace override pinned authlib >=1.6.11; bump to >=1.6.12 and relock (resolved to 1.7.2).


Note

Low Risk
Dependency-only security pin with lockfile refresh; authlib is not directly referenced in workspace source, though OAuth-related transitive behavior may change on the 1.6.x→1.7.x jump.

Overview
Bumps the tool.uv override for authlib from >=1.6.11 to >=1.6.12, with an updated comment noting PYSEC-2026-188 alongside the existing CSRF advisory.

uv.lock reflects the relock: authlib 1.6.11 → 1.7.2, a new transitive dependency joserfc, and a no-op exclude-newer placeholder for backwards compatibility with relative exclude-newer settings.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit de74b71. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated authlib dependency to a newer patched version for improved security and stability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Review Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

Pull request was closed or merged during review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d6416c05-f62d-491d-b1d0-0452411d46ac

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee70702 and de74b71.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates the authlib dependency constraint from version >=1.6.11 to >=1.6.12 in pyproject.toml, including the coordinated security comment that documents the vulnerability fix threshold.

Changes

Authlib Version Bump

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update authlib minimum version
pyproject.toml
The authlib version constraint in tool.uv.override-dependencies is increased to >=1.6.12, and the security comment at line 189 is updated to reference the new minimum patched version.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

size/XS

Suggested reviewers

  • joaomdmoura

Poem

🐰 A patch so small, yet mighty and bright,
Authlib hops forward to version new light,
Comments aligned, constraints now refined,
Security patched with precision in mind!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly matches the main change: bumping authlib dependency to patch PYSEC-2026-188 security vulnerability.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch gl/fix/bump-authlib-cve

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@greysonlalonde greysonlalonde merged commit 7676b09 into main Jun 3, 2026
56 of 57 checks passed
@greysonlalonde greysonlalonde deleted the gl/fix/bump-authlib-cve branch June 3, 2026 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants