PROPOSAL: Revenue-Backed CRO - Buys and Burns of CRO with 100% of Product Revenue #1323
Unanswered
lezzokafka
asked this question in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
|
The on-chain proposal is now live as Proposal #37 and is in its voting period.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
PROPOSAL: Revenue-Backed CRO - Buys and Burns of CRO with 100% of Product Revenue
Abstract
We propose two changes to how Cronos Labs product revenue and future staking yield are handled:
Breadth brings activities. Activities bring revenue. Revenue burns CRO. Together we create a direct linkage between the products, CRO and its ecosystem.
Motivation
What this proposal bring
The current position was set by A New Era for CRO #1291. That proposal moved staking from emissions to revenue and named where revenue would go. Alongside the product launch, this proposal takes the next step: the mechanism itself, and a commitment that all revenue from Ult and Cronos Launch buys CRO on the open market and burns it.
The moment
Why the reserve is paired with it
Proposal #1291 set the direction and the decay schedule. It left open how revenue would reach CRO and how much of it would back staking yield. This proposal supplies both execution details.
The revenue commitment here is deliberately aggressive: 100% to buy back and burn. #1291 had envisaged revenue split across four buckets, one of which was staking yield. Removing that split is what makes the burn absolute — and it is also what creates an obligation.
Emissions are decaying under the schedule approved in #1291. The Strategic Reserve is proposed to act as a source to keep staking rewards whole, and with them the economic security of the network.
One reduces supply. The other keeps the chain secure while it happens. They are proposed together because separating them would leave the second unfunded.
Part A - 100% of product revenue buys and burns CRO
How it works
Figure 1. The direct linkage, end to end. Revenue from both products reaches one contract, buys CRO, and burns it.
Revenue in, CRO out of supply. Three stages, and no discretion at any point.
Three properties hold across all three stages, and they are the reason this is a mechanism rather than a policy: it is automatic, it runs on a schedule, and it is onchain and verifiable
Cadence
Buybacks may occur more frequently than burns. Burns are scheduled monthly, executed on-chain with every published hash.
What changes for CRO holders
Product usage becomes supply reduction, mechanically. The commitment is to have 100% of the revenue directly contributed to CRO and its ecosystem, with full visibility in an onchain way.
Part B - Use of the Strategic Reserve to fund staking rewards going forward
Why a reserve is needed
Two things reduce what reaches stakers, and both were decided deliberately.
The first was voted on. #1291 set CRO emissions from staking rewards to decay. That is a community decision already taken, not a projection. In the same proposal, the commitment was made that “a base staking rate is intended to be maintained throughout”, so that “stakers continue to earn a baseline yield for securing the network” at every phase of the transition.
The second is Part A of this proposal. Committing 100% of product revenue to buy back and burn means revenue is not available to fund staking yield.
Emissions are decaying and revenue is now spoken for. The base staking and tier locking rate therefore needs a funded source of its own. This honours what #1291 already promised stakers.
What changes for delegators on Cronos POS
Nothing about how you stake or what you earn. Reward rate, tier structures, lock periods and bonus rates are unchanged.
Implementation
Governance Votes
An on-chain governance proposal will be raised. The following items summarize the voting options and what they mean for this proposal.
The voting period is 14 days. Quorum is 33.4% of bonded CRO, and more than 50% of non-abstain votes must be Yes. If you delegate and do not vote, your stake inherits your validator's vote, and voting directly overrides it.
Let us know your thoughts
The importance of active community participation in shaping the future of the Cronos POS chain cannot be overstated. Engage with your delegated validators and participate in proposal discussions on Discord and GitHub. Your input is vital in fostering a vibrant ecosystem that benefits all CRO holders and the wider ecosystem.
Disclaimer: This proposal is provided for informational and governance-discussion purposes only. Nothing in this proposal constitutes, or should be construed as, financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Governance participants should conduct their own independent evaluation before voting. This proposal contains forward-looking statements, projections, and illustrative examples based on current expectations and assumptions. Actual outcomes may differ materially due to a range of factors, including, without limitation, market conditions, user adoption, regulatory developments, technical considerations, security risks, and governance decisions. Nothing in this proposal constitutes a guarantee, commitment, or promise of future performance, results, or product availability.
All reactions