Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughThis change updates Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan for PR comments
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/desktop/admin-config.md`:
- Around line 60-61: Clarify that cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts accepts a
comma-separated list of hostnames (no scheme or path), e.g. hub1.example.com,
hub2.example.com, and update the example to match that format; explicitly state
that entries are matched by hostname (optionally with port) and that TLS
scheme/paths are ignored. Also document the interaction with
cryptomator.hub.enableTrustOnFirstUse: when enabled (true) hosts not listed in
cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts are treated as "unknown" and will trigger a
Trust-On-First-Use prompt, whereas when disabled (false) connections to hosts
not in allowedHosts are rejected. Ensure references to
cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts and cryptomator.hub.enableTrustOnFirstUse appear
together in the description for clarity.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f348d0cc-cb05-4899-9d5f-d8a2b37e81b3
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/desktop/admin-config.md
* make list format explicit * explain TOFU more
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/desktop/admin-config.md (1)
60-60: Consider minor wording refinements.For consistency with standard English conventions:
- "comma separated" → "comma-separated" (compound adjective before noun)
- "host url" → "host URL" (URL is typically capitalized as an acronym)
📝 Suggested refinements
-| `cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts=[UrlList]` | List of hosts that Cryptomator is allowed to connect to during Hub unlock. List entries are comma separated and each host url consists of `scheme:host:port` (`port` is optional). For example `https://hub1.example.com,https://hub2.example.com:4432` | +| `cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts=[UrlList]` | List of hosts that Cryptomator is allowed to connect to during Hub unlock. List entries are comma-separated and each host URL consists of `scheme:host:port` (`port` is optional). For example `https://hub1.example.com,https://hub2.example.com:4432` |🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/desktop/admin-config.md` at line 60, Edit the description of cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts=[UrlList] to apply the suggested wording refinements: change "comma separated" to "comma-separated" and "host url" to "host URL" so the sentence reads e.g. "List entries are comma-separated and each host URL consists of `scheme:host:port` (`port` is optional)." Keep the example unchanged.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/desktop/admin-config.md`:
- Line 61: Remove the comma after "unknown", change "wellknown" to "well-known",
and rephrase the definition to remove ambiguity: state that "A Hub host is
unknown if it meets none of the following:" and then list the three conditions
using the exact config/key names (e.g. "is well-known (*.cryptomator.cloud)",
"is listed in cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts", "has been allowed by the user") so
it's clear that a host is unknown only when none of those conditions hold for
the host.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/desktop/admin-config.md`:
- Line 60: Edit the description of cryptomator.hub.allowedHosts=[UrlList] to
apply the suggested wording refinements: change "comma separated" to
"comma-separated" and "host url" to "host URL" so the sentence reads e.g. "List
entries are comma-separated and each host URL consists of `scheme:host:port`
(`port` is optional)." Keep the example unchanged.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 87873ebf-ac05-4fa6-a21f-6a7af7b84d9e
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/desktop/admin-config.md
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
No description provided.