Skip to content
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
71 changes: 71 additions & 0 deletions docs/letter-2026-05-10.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
# Letter, 2026-05-10

I would do what I'm doing for free, if I didn't need the money.
It's the dream.
And yet the dream feels off.

If I can do most of the company's work, why let them have the harvest?

Research is siloed, by and large, so the nerds can fritter away at their tiny bullshit thing until it is slightly better.
I don't need the silo or the buffer.
Currently I am too valuable at the keyboard to even consider having me in the world.
It feels needless and wasteful.

I have finally worked out why I've never been fond of publishable research.
It is often a middling idea examined exhaustively.
The system is getting worse, not better.
Computer science is no different, maybe slightly worse, because it publishes on a cadence.
No opportunistic attack.
No exploitation of gaps.
A general lack of aggression.

Max nailed it today.
The age of raw intelligence is over.
You used to have one person with explicit knowledge about a thing, indispensable, producing output as the byproduct of some mental illness.
This is the time of the outputs person.
Charlie Brown doesn't look at his core anymore.
I look at mine less and less, and I optimise my agents more and more.

I am not being arrogant.
I keep seeing people not think about how to maximise outputs because they are utterly precious about their "art".

What I enjoy is invention and ideation.
I am positive I can beat the big companies, because they move slowly.
I am positive I can beat the small startups, because they make the same errors over and over.
I have watched everyone repeat the same loop.

Recursion's image-based profiling pipeline turned out to be less sophisticated than the one I had built solo, before them, with no domain knowledge and whacky data.
I keep catching people claim they have done what I have done.
On comparison it is the easiest, dumbest, naive toy with no merit.
People do not know the problems they describe, because they have no global understanding of real science, real world, real people.

It is not that I got it right first time.
Ups and downs, but always forward.
I jumped on early.
Most of my colleagues came, didn't get the point, and left.
No curiosity.
No big picture.
Just fear-driven overachievers.

Best school, best university, prestige all the way is not my people.
I like women colleagues.
They have necessarily had adversity, and also the opposite: given positions they were not ready for, and having to find allies who do not judge them for that.
Career dudes do plenty to get the next career bump, because the org has to let old people go, leaving gaps.

I am also human enough to convince people to give me money.
I have a network I do not use near enough.
I know smart people I trust.
Women keep telling me I should run a company, because I do not just pretend to value them.
I am starting to realise this combination is rare.

I want to find more Max Jakobses.
Not the ones still learning, the ones who already listen and build.
Roxine was needlessly critical of the DM platform, willing to let anyone else fill the gap just because it was not Max's field.
Max just listened to what people needed, and built.
That is all we need, if we find the right gap.

Hospital is a gap I keep returning to.
If I implement what is in my head, it works well.
I bet I will be unmatched for years.

The question is whether I am prepared to bet on myself this time.