[LTS 9.2] CVE-2024-26923, CVE-2024-35937, CVE-2024-58002 #704
Conversation
jira VULN-8201 cve-pre CVE-2024-26923 commit-author Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> commit 4d322dc syzbot reported a lockdep splat [1]. Blamed commit hinted about the possible lockdep violation, and code used unix_state_lock_nested() in an attempt to silence lockdep. It is not sufficient, because unix_state_lock_nested() is already used from unix_state_double_lock(). We need to use a separate subclass. This patch adds a distinct enumeration to make things more explicit. Also use swap() in unix_state_double_lock() as a clean up. v2: add a missing inline keyword to unix_state_lock_nested() [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00356-g8a696a29c690 #0 Not tainted syz-executor.1/2542 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88808b5df9e8 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: skb_queue_tail+0x36/0x120 net/core/skbuff.c:3863 but task is already holding lock: ffff88808b5dfe70 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: unix_dgram_sendmsg+0xfc7/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2089 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> ctrliq#1 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:378 sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:87 [inline] sk_diag_fill+0x6ea/0xfe0 net/unix/diag.c:157 sk_diag_dump net/unix/diag.c:196 [inline] unix_diag_dump+0x3e9/0x630 net/unix/diag.c:220 netlink_dump+0x5c1/0xcd0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2264 __netlink_dump_start+0x5d7/0x780 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2370 netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:338 [inline] unix_diag_handler_dump+0x1c3/0x8f0 net/unix/diag.c:319 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0xe3/0x400 netlink_rcv_skb+0x1df/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2543 sock_diag_rcv+0x2a/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:280 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1341 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x7e6/0x980 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1367 netlink_sendmsg+0xa37/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1908 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] sock_write_iter+0x39a/0x520 net/socket.c:1160 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2085 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xa74/0xca0 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b -> #0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 skb_queue_tail+0x36/0x120 net/core/skbuff.c:3863 unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x15d9/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2112 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x592/0x890 net/socket.c:2584 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x730 net/socket.c:2724 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2753 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2750 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2750 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&u->lock/1); lock(rlock-AF_UNIX); lock(&u->lock/1); lock(rlock-AF_UNIX); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.1/2542: #0: ffff88808b5dfe70 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: unix_dgram_sendmsg+0xfc7/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2089 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 2542 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00356-g8a696a29c690 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/17/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x366/0x490 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 skb_queue_tail+0x36/0x120 net/core/skbuff.c:3863 unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x15d9/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2112 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x592/0x890 net/socket.c:2584 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x730 net/socket.c:2724 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2753 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2750 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2750 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7f26d887cda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f26d95a60c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f26d89abf80 RCX: 00007f26d887cda9 RDX: 000000000000003e RSI: 00000000200bd000 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f26d88c947a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000008c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f26d89abf80 R15: 00007ffcfe081a68 Fixes: 2aac7a2 ("unix_diag: Pending connections IDs NLA") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240130184235.1620738-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 4d322dc) Signed-off-by: Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>
jira VULN-8201 cve CVE-2024-26923 commit-author Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> commit 47d8ac0 upstream-diff No actual difference from the upstream patch, but required manual conflicts resolution due to differences in neighbouring code (`inflight_refs') Garbage collector does not take into account the risk of embryo getting enqueued during the garbage collection. If such embryo has a peer that carries SCM_RIGHTS, two consecutive passes of scan_children() may see a different set of children. Leading to an incorrectly elevated inflight count, and then a dangling pointer within the gc_inflight_list. sockets are AF_UNIX/SOCK_STREAM S is an unconnected socket L is a listening in-flight socket bound to addr, not in fdtable V's fd will be passed via sendmsg(), gets inflight count bumped connect(S, addr) sendmsg(S, [V]); close(V) __unix_gc() ---------------- ------------------------- ----------- NS = unix_create1() skb1 = sock_wmalloc(NS) L = unix_find_other(addr) unix_state_lock(L) unix_peer(S) = NS // V count=1 inflight=0 NS = unix_peer(S) skb2 = sock_alloc() skb_queue_tail(NS, skb2[V]) // V became in-flight // V count=2 inflight=1 close(V) // V count=1 inflight=1 // GC candidate condition met for u in gc_inflight_list: if (total_refs == inflight_refs) add u to gc_candidates // gc_candidates={L, V} for u in gc_candidates: scan_children(u, dec_inflight) // embryo (skb1) was not // reachable from L yet, so V's // inflight remains unchanged __skb_queue_tail(L, skb1) unix_state_unlock(L) for u in gc_candidates: if (u.inflight) scan_children(u, inc_inflight_move_tail) // V count=1 inflight=2 (!) If there is a GC-candidate listening socket, lock/unlock its state. This makes GC wait until the end of any ongoing connect() to that socket. After flipping the lock, a possibly SCM-laden embryo is already enqueued. And if there is another embryo coming, it can not possibly carry SCM_RIGHTS. At this point, unix_inflight() can not happen because unix_gc_lock is already taken. Inflight graph remains unaffected. Fixes: 1fd05ba ("[AF_UNIX]: Rewrite garbage collector, fixes race.") Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409201047.1032217-1-mhal@rbox.co Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 47d8ac0) Signed-off-by: Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>
…nix_gc(). jira VULN-8201 cve-bf CVE-2024-26923 commit-author Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> commit 1971d13 syzbot reported a lockdep splat regarding unix_gc_lock and unix_state_lock(). One is called from recvmsg() for a connected socket, and another is called from GC for TCP_LISTEN socket. So, the splat is false-positive. Let's add a dedicated lock class for the latter to suppress the splat. Note that this change is not necessary for net-next.git as the issue is only applied to the old GC impl. [0]: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00007-g4d2008430ce8 #0 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- kworker/u8:1/11 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88807cea4e70 (&u->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] ffff88807cea4e70 (&u->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __unix_gc+0x40e/0xf70 net/unix/garbage.c:302 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f6ab638 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] ffffffff8f6ab638 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __unix_gc+0x117/0xf70 net/unix/garbage.c:261 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> ctrliq#1 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] unix_notinflight+0x13d/0x390 net/unix/garbage.c:140 unix_detach_fds net/unix/af_unix.c:1819 [inline] unix_destruct_scm+0x221/0x350 net/unix/af_unix.c:1876 skb_release_head_state+0x100/0x250 net/core/skbuff.c:1188 skb_release_all net/core/skbuff.c:1200 [inline] __kfree_skb net/core/skbuff.c:1216 [inline] kfree_skb_reason+0x16d/0x3b0 net/core/skbuff.c:1252 kfree_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1262 [inline] manage_oob net/unix/af_unix.c:2672 [inline] unix_stream_read_generic+0x1125/0x2700 net/unix/af_unix.c:2749 unix_stream_splice_read+0x239/0x320 net/unix/af_unix.c:2981 do_splice_read fs/splice.c:985 [inline] splice_file_to_pipe+0x299/0x500 fs/splice.c:1295 do_splice+0xf2d/0x1880 fs/splice.c:1379 __do_splice fs/splice.c:1436 [inline] __do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1652 [inline] __se_sys_splice+0x331/0x4a0 fs/splice.c:1634 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&u->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] __unix_gc+0x40e/0xf70 net/unix/garbage.c:302 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa10/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(unix_gc_lock); lock(&u->lock); lock(unix_gc_lock); lock(&u->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kworker/u8:1/11: #0: ffff888015089148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline] #0: ffff888015089148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x8e0/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 ctrliq#1: ffffc90000107d00 (unix_gc_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3230 [inline] ctrliq#1: ffffc90000107d00 (unix_gc_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x91b/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 ctrliq#2: ffffffff8f6ab638 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] ctrliq#2: ffffffff8f6ab638 (unix_gc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __unix_gc+0x117/0xf70 net/unix/garbage.c:261 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00007-g4d2008430ce8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] __unix_gc+0x40e/0xf70 net/unix/garbage.c:302 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa10/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK> Fixes: 47d8ac0 ("af_unix: Fix garbage collector racing against connect()") Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+fa379358c28cc87cc307@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fa379358c28cc87cc307 Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424170443.9832-1-kuniyu@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 1971d13) Signed-off-by: Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>
|
@kerneltoast can you double check interdiff for this commit? It looks weird. |
PlaidCat
left a comment
PlaidCat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
but waiting on response from kerneltoat
The commit looked ok, I double checked. I just signaled that interdiff does not work as intented, I believe. |
|
@roxanan1996 Sorry for the late reply, this got lost in my inbox. 😞 That first hunk of just a bunch of minus lines was conclusively fixed in my last interdiff update ("Fixed remaining edge cases where spurious added or deleted code blocks would appear in the output due to rejected hunks"). I do see some other little issues here with the latest version of interdiff; did you notice any other issues besides that first hunk? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Huh, why is the git commit author for wifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully set to Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> instead of Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>? The commit date appears to have incorrectly been copied from the upstream commit too.
This is how Is this required to have author = commiter @PlaidCat? |
You're right this is NOT how upstream does this for sure. we've always used See RedHat Changes Its buried in the wiki text so maybe not the most obvious that if you use cherry pick it should be using
I didn't catch this on initial review so I would appreciate it you're set to the author |
I remember this Just to be sure - is it ok to have different author date and commit date? I sometimes raw cherry pick (without |
jira VULN-5183 cve CVE-2024-35937 commit-author Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> commit 9ad7974 upstream-diff | 1. All changes to the `ieee80211_is_valid_amsdu' function were discarded because it's missing from `ciqlts9_2'. 2. Changes to `ieee80211_amsdu_to_8023s' were adapted to account for the missing 986e43b from `ciqlts9_2' history: the `copy_len > remaining' condition was changed to `sizeof(eth) > remaining', as `sizeof(eth)' is the only possible value `copy_len' could have assumed in `ciqlts9_2' if it was introduced without backporting 986e43b (pointless). If it looks like there's another subframe in the A-MSDU but the header isn't fully there, we can end up reading data out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a bit more careful and check if the subframe header can even be present. Reported-by: syzbot+d050d437fe47d479d210@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://msgid.link/20240226203405.a731e2c95e38.I82ce7d8c0cc8970ce29d0a39fdc07f1ffc425be4@changeid Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 9ad7974) Signed-off-by: Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>
jira VULN-53464 cve-pre CVE-2024-58002 commit-author Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> commit 64627da Avoid using the iterators after the list_for_each() constructs. This patch should be a NOP, but makes cocci, happier: drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c:1861:44-50: ERROR: invalid reference to the index variable of the iterator on line 1850 drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c:2195:17-23: ERROR: invalid reference to the index variable of the iterator on line 2179 Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> (cherry picked from commit 64627da) Signed-off-by: Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>
jira VULN-53464 cve-pre CVE-2024-58002 commit-author Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> commit d9fecd0 Now we keep a reference to the active fh for any call to uvc_ctrl_set, regardless if it is an actual set or if it is a just a try or if the device refused the operation. We should only keep the file handle if the device actually accepted applying the operation. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e5225c8 ("media: uvcvideo: Send a control event when a Control Change interrupt arrives") Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203-uvc-fix-async-v6-1-26c867231118@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit d9fecd0) Signed-off-by: Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>
jira VULN-53464 cve CVE-2024-58002 commit-author Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> commit 221cd51 upstream-diff `guard(mutex)' construct replaced with older locking scheme because `ciqlts9_2' lacks 54da6a0. This commit is actually a direct cherry pick of the 5.15 stable backport 117f7a2. When an async control is written, we copy a pointer to the file handle that started the operation. That pointer will be used when the device is done. Which could be anytime in the future. If the user closes that file descriptor, its structure will be freed, and there will be one dangling pointer per pending async control, that the driver will try to use. Clean all the dangling pointers during release(). To avoid adding a performance penalty in the most common case (no async operation), a counter has been introduced with some logic to make sure that it is properly handled. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e5225c8 ("media: uvcvideo: Send a control event when a Control Change interrupt arrives") Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203-uvc-fix-async-v6-3-26c867231118@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 221cd51) Signed-off-by: Marcin Wcisło <marcin.wcislo@conclusive.pl>
pvts-mat
force-pushed
the
ciqlts9_2-CVE-batch-11
branch
from
052793b to
ba109c8
Compare
You're not using ciq-cherry-pick.py? |
Oh he does but there are some edge conditions with using CentOS-streams we're not yet handling. He did the git workspace / worktree changes to |
I missed this, because the date of the commit is going to be changed due to the date WE introduce it to our franken kernels its fine a know issue discrepancy. @kerneltoast , @pvts-mat has resolved the comment and request change, do you mind reevaluating or dropping your block so we can merge? |
4 participants
[LTS 9.2]
CVE-2024-26923 VULN-8201
CVE-2024-35937 VULN-5183
CVE-2024-58002 VULN-53464
Commits
CVE-2024-26923
5514900:
7127fb9:
e7f6aee:
The 4d322dc commit is not so much a prerequisite for the cve fix as it is for its bugfix 1971d13. Same solution can be found in
linux-5.15.y, although mixed with fixes for other CVEs (CVE-2024-26750, CVE-2024-26780, CVE-2024-36972, CVE-2024-26676, all CVSS 5.5).CVE-2024-35937
132eaaa:
CVE-2024-58002
Neutral code refactor, makes next next picks clean:
b00b1a4:
CVE-lacking fix of the same culprit commit e5225c8, which additionally makes the next pick clean.
068e994:
The fix proper for CVE-2024-58002:
052793b:
Additional CVE-lacking fixes exist for e5225c8: 04d3398 and 619d9b7. Both were backported to stable
5.15(14810fb and 8e62139). Omitted in the PR to keep it focused.kABI check: passed
Boot test: passed
boot-test.log
Kselftests: passed relative
Reference
kselftests–ciqlts9_2–run1.log
Patch
kselftests–ciqlts9_2-CVE-batch-11–run1.log
kselftests–ciqlts9_2-CVE-batch-11–run2.log
Comparison
The tests results for the reference and the patch are the same.