update(driver-materialize) compatibility with newer versions

[joacoc]

Check List

• Tests has been run in packages where changes made if available
• Linter has been run for changed code
• Tests for the changes have been added if not covered yet
• Docs have been added / updated if required

Issue Reference this PR resolves

There is no reference issue.

Description of Changes Made (if issue reference is not provided)

Newer versions of Materialize have a different way to query the schema.
This PR maintains backward compatibility with older versions too.

Added semver lib to calculate the versions.
Added ramda lib to keep the same mechanism to return the schema as BaseDriver in tablesSchema.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5148 (3ef4012) into master (19e7a71) will decrease coverage by 22.96%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5148       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   82.99%   60.02%   -22.97%     
===========================================
  Files         129      139       +10     
  Lines       19607    11593     -8014     
  Branches        0     2918     +2918     
===========================================
- Hits        16272     6959     -9313     
- Misses       3335     4130      +795     
- Partials        0      504      +504     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cube-backend	60.02% <ø> (?)
cubesql	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
rust/cubesql/cubesql/src/compile/service.rs
...sql/cubeclient/src/models/v1_load_request_query.rs
...cubesql/cubesql/src/compile/rewrite/rules/dates.rs
...src/models/v1_load_request_query_time_dimension.rs
.../engine/information_schema/postgres/pg_sequence.rs
rust/cubesql/cubesql/src/sql/server_manager.rs
rust/cubesql/cubesql/e2e/main.rs
...st/cubesql/cubesql/src/compile/engine/df/coerce.rs
rust/cubesql/pg-srv/src/lib.rs
rust/cubesql/cubesql/src/compile/parser.rs
... and 258 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[buntarb]

Hi, @joacoc! Thanks for your contribution. I have reviewed this PR, and it looks straightforward enough. But unfortunately, there were some significant changes (the BaseDriver class was split into an independent package) a while ago, and it contains some conflicts and stuff to fix. So, could you please rebase and fix it?