refactoring: use stl regex instead of boost::regex#266
Merged
ursfassler merged 1 commit intocucumber:mainfrom Dec 17, 2023
Merged
refactoring: use stl regex instead of boost::regex#266ursfassler merged 1 commit intocucumber:mainfrom
ursfassler merged 1 commit intocucumber:mainfrom
Conversation
This removes the support for repeated captures (i.e. boost::regex_constants::match_extra), which may break some use cases. It is expected that such use cases are rare.
7c4db4f to
e32b7fd
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Use standard library regex instead of boost one.
Details
Refactoring to remove no longer needed dependencies.
This removes the support for repeated captures (i.e. boost::regex_constants::match_extra), which may break some use cases. It is expected that such use cases are rare.
Motivation and Context
Less dependencies for functionality that is provided by the standard library.
How Has This Been Tested?
This is a refactoring, it should not change the behavior (expect for repeated captures). All automated tests still work.
Types of changes
Checklist: