Added support for user define custom actions#376
Conversation
pokey
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good with some minor comments
pokey
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, but could use a couple tests for the new executeCommand, esp exercising a couple args such as restoreSelection
|
Paste and copy use restore selection so already tested that way. I can add some more if you like? |
Just meant having a couple tests which use |
|
I added a test for a custom command. More than that I don't know how to do. We do not support different arguments in custom command csv yet and none of the makeshift actions do anything that our test recorder can use. I guess I can hand craft a test case? Edit: I think a solved it. You can use define to actually move selection within the same file. Now we have two test cases one that restore selection and one that don't |
No description provided.